<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAB Challenge squads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tooserious.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782</link>
	<description>For those who take it way too seriously...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:49:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: walesy</title>
		<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782&#038;cpage=7#comment-24357</link>
		<dc:creator>walesy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tooserious.net/?p=782#comment-24357</guid>
		<description>It would be hard to say &quot;better&quot;. Both Martin and Barlow will be excellent choices. Two of the top 3 mids for mine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be hard to say &#8220;better&#8221;. Both Martin and Barlow will be excellent choices. Two of the top 3 mids for mine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hutchy</title>
		<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782&#038;cpage=7#comment-24355</link>
		<dc:creator>Hutchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tooserious.net/?p=782#comment-24355</guid>
		<description>At the moment I have Martin at M6, do you think he will get a game?
And would Barlow be a better choice?

Any word on Shuey... will he play R1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the moment I have Martin at M6, do you think he will get a game?<br />
And would Barlow be a better choice?</p>
<p>Any word on Shuey&#8230; will he play R1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny</title>
		<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782&#038;cpage=6#comment-24258</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tooserious.net/?p=782#comment-24258</guid>
		<description>Hitchcock wasn&#039;t even listed in the players that were close to it either. Considering Williams said he&#039;ll be a chance for round one a few weeks ago they&#039;ve obviously heard nothing about him. The Herald Sun doesn&#039;t know too much about the non Victorian teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchcock wasn&#8217;t even listed in the players that were close to it either. Considering Williams said he&#8217;ll be a chance for round one a few weeks ago they&#8217;ve obviously heard nothing about him. The Herald Sun doesn&#8217;t know too much about the non Victorian teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782&#038;cpage=6#comment-24242</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tooserious.net/?p=782#comment-24242</guid>
		<description>@JJ, I seem to recall Waters not being mentioned in the WCE write-up also, like no where, as if he wasn&#039;t even on their list. Don&#039;t think we should take those as gospel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JJ, I seem to recall Waters not being mentioned in the WCE write-up also, like no where, as if he wasn&#8217;t even on their list. Don&#8217;t think we should take those as gospel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stick</title>
		<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782&#038;cpage=6#comment-24241</link>
		<dc:creator>stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tooserious.net/?p=782#comment-24241</guid>
		<description>No Hitchcock means fwd rookie choices are EXTREMELY thin....

I can&#039;t think of many that will get a game most weeks in the first 8 rounds that I like....

Dare I say Mr GUMBY must be back in contention :O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Hitchcock means fwd rookie choices are EXTREMELY thin&#8230;.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think of many that will get a game most weeks in the first 8 rounds that I like&#8230;.</p>
<p>Dare I say Mr GUMBY must be back in contention :O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macaldo</title>
		<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782&#038;cpage=6#comment-24235</link>
		<dc:creator>macaldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tooserious.net/?p=782#comment-24235</guid>
		<description>Yeah same with me stu, ive had him in and out about 10 times now, just thoughts are whether to downgrade to a bartel, mitchell, etc and free up cash, or take the punt on him as he is so capable of massive scores...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah same with me stu, ive had him in and out about 10 times now, just thoughts are whether to downgrade to a bartel, mitchell, etc and free up cash, or take the punt on him as he is so capable of massive scores&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782&#038;cpage=6#comment-24232</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tooserious.net/?p=782#comment-24232</guid>
		<description>I guess there are a few other bench forward options coming through, Roberts from Richmond could be one that fills in and Peterson from the Hawks might be another one, plus they&#039;re both rookie priced from memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess there are a few other bench forward options coming through, Roberts from Richmond could be one that fills in and Peterson from the Hawks might be another one, plus they&#8217;re both rookie priced from memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782&#038;cpage=6#comment-24231</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tooserious.net/?p=782#comment-24231</guid>
		<description>I noted hitchcock wasn&#039;t mentioned at all in the HUN&#039;s Port team wrap-up today (ie wasn&#039;t in the 22 and wasn&#039;t listed as pushing for selection either). Not sure he&#039;s got a place in the side unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noted hitchcock wasn&#8217;t mentioned at all in the HUN&#8217;s Port team wrap-up today (ie wasn&#8217;t in the 22 and wasn&#8217;t listed as pushing for selection either). Not sure he&#8217;s got a place in the side unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris88</title>
		<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782&#038;cpage=6#comment-24228</link>
		<dc:creator>chris88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tooserious.net/?p=782#comment-24228</guid>
		<description>And crap - http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/powers-bionic-man-david-rodan-is-so-close-to-a-comeback/story-e6frf9jf-1225841391822.

If Rodan comes back this early, Port might not upgrade Hitchcock. Then again, with Wade Thompson injured as well, maybe they still might upgrade him as the one rookie they can bring up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And crap &#8211; <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/powers-bionic-man-david-rodan-is-so-close-to-a-comeback/story-e6frf9jf-1225841391822" rel="nofollow">http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/powers-bionic-man-david-rodan-is-so-close-to-a-comeback/story-e6frf9jf-1225841391822</a>.</p>
<p>If Rodan comes back this early, Port might not upgrade Hitchcock. Then again, with Wade Thompson injured as well, maybe they still might upgrade him as the one rookie they can bring up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris88</title>
		<link>http://tooserious.net/?p=782&#038;cpage=6#comment-24221</link>
		<dc:creator>chris88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tooserious.net/?p=782#comment-24221</guid>
		<description>Nason is definitely ahead of Webberley at this stage. Where this leaves him in terms of place in the first 22 isn&#039;t clear as yet - but he is being picked in many longtime supporters&#039; first 22s to play Carlton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nason is definitely ahead of Webberley at this stage. Where this leaves him in terms of place in the first 22 isn&#8217;t clear as yet &#8211; but he is being picked in many longtime supporters&#8217; first 22s to play Carlton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
