Yes, mini draft would be after the PSD, and would be the same order as the regular PSD - so yeah, 8th place gets pick 11 and pick 29.
Not sure if this is the place to post this but this thread is getting some activity. I thought the whole idea about expanded lists was to accomodate mandatory delisting. If we look like we're only going to delist 4 then I can't see the point in increasing list sizes and if we're trying to implement some kind of equalisation measure I can't understand why we'd change the draft order for the mini-draft. The only reason why I voted for the mini draft was in the off chance that we'd award double picks to try and bridge the gap between top & bottom. Like I've just told Bryzza, if you read through the other ORFF leagues you'll find that 5th & 6th round picks have currency as people are drafting that deep, because picks are worth more players seem to be worth a little less and as such more trades get done. I understand that 4th round picks will now have value but they'll still be low picks; if we're taking 6 then 4th round picks are worth so much more. Like I said earlier I'm shattered that we look like only taking 4 picks as a minimum as its really not going to cut into the lists of the strong nor help the 'less strong'.
I disagree . We are increasingly list sizes to help teams stay competitive this doesn't help top teams . Delisting 6 hurts the middle teams more than anything building a team means you need back up for injuries but more importantly looking towards the future most teams have aging players and you need ready made replacements if I was to delist 6 each season how am I to plan for the future ? What we have done is massive for the league time will tell if it works but there is only so much we can do ultimately it's up to coaches to decide what the best is for there teams . My team is a shadow of its former self will it work I hope so but I may fall on my sword with my decisions, again time will team Sent from my GT-N7105T using Tapatalk