See above. Remember, we only have three weeks allocated for finals. This poll will close on the 8th of February
If it helps to avoid any confusion or possibility of non-FU people skewing our results... I've voted.
<div class='Quote' abp='652]<em abp='653]JPK wrote:<br abp='654] </br> <p abp='655]If it helps to avoid any confusion or possibility of non-FU people skewing our results... I've voted. <p abp='656]+1
choppers wrote: <div class='Quote' abp='652]<em abp='653]JPK wrote:<br abp='654[/img] <p abp='655]If it helps to avoid any confusion or possibility of non-FU people skewing our results... I've voted. <p abp='656]+1 Me too
Just so you are all on the same page, the last option does not offer the top 4 a second chance because we only have 3 weeks allocated for finals
I've voted begrudgingly. All around the world in sports a structure final series (knock out) is always 1st v 5th, 2nd v 6th, 3rd v 7th & 4th v 8th. In the second week of the finals, the four winners from the previous weeks finals will playoff in seeded matches, the winner of 1st v 5th will play the winner of 3rd v 7th and the winner of 2nd v 6th will play the winner of 4th v 8th.
It's a tie! WTF?? Hopefully we do not need a vote on how to break the tie?? I reckon the Commish gets to make the final say.
The Commissioner and Board have decided that option 2 is the winner of the poll with a structure finals seriers of 1 v 8, 2 v 7, 3 v 6, 4 v 5. The rules will be updated as such: (b) In the first week the finals structure will be 1 v 8, 2 v 7, 3 v 6, 4 v 5. (c) In the second week of the finals, the four winners from the previous weeks finals will playoff in seeded matches, the winner of 1st v 8th will play the winner of 4th v 5th and the winner of 2nd v 7th will play the winner of 3rd v 6th.