Ruck advise required. I currently have; Sandilands and Jolly R3 Petrie R4 Zac Smith (Gold Coast) Do I have too much money spent on ruckman? I am figuring that with the byes I would need to ensure that I good ruck service with the scoring. I am figuring tha Smith will get oddles of game time and can assist with a player upgrade in later rounds
R3 and R4 is doing my head in. I have sex on the beach but tossing up spending an extra 120K with smith and J Tippert at R3/R4 and Petrie in the forwards instead of Smith / Rookie / Rookie. Benefits are set and forget rucks at the sacrifice of R4. Is 120k worth a trade or two if Petrie does fire up or Smith does not perform? I have also considered Petrie/Smith at R3/R4 but find it hard to justify an extra 90k on the bench. This option does not enable the benefit of Petrie and Smith scoring well.
Sandilands + Hille - Sand Dune Sandilands + Kreuzer - Beach Buggy Sandilands + Kreuzer + Hille - Dune Buggy
Wal maybe more like Sandilands-Hille-Kreuzer rather than Kreuzer-Hille (the order is important) but I like it.
Puntroader, keep in mind that Jolly's preseason has stunk and Petrie misses 2 or the first 5 games, but he did play very well on the weekend. Personally its too much to spend on R3, but for added security could pay dividends.
difficult to manage the rest of the list is fairly well balanced. Have had about 388920328 differing combinations. Might, dump Petrie for Ryder, who is to play a kick behind the play this year. He will have a field day with soft possesions.
I'd dump Jolly for Ryder no way would I have a ruckman at the huge price for just 4 games in the year.
With Ryder being labelled lazy, the Cox combo might need to be changed to the starfish. http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/116747/default.aspx