Forward dilemma!

i have to bench one of krakouer, knights and tapscott. Krakouer plays blues, knights plays freo and tapscott plays lions. Which 1 should i bench??????

 

krak may be the sub for friday night, so that may help your decision...

Knights if not.

 

Krak won't b a sub 2 games in a row

 

<blockquote>Quote from Fez on April 4, 2011, 15:00
Krak won't b a sub 2 games in a row </blockquote>
Was subbed off in Rd 1 and named sub in Rd 2

 

Hmm i reckon ill sub krakouer, cos i reckon knights will love the free space of subiaco and tapscott will destroy lions

 

Knights (Chris, i assume) is playing at home against Freo.

 

Here's a forward dilemna - I've got Astbury!!!!!
I'm having thoughts about fixing this by trading Astbury for Darling (already have Tapscott) and then Broughton for Enright. Thoughts??

 

Keep Broughton, he's good. I'm keeping him. He's had 2 mediocre games but he still scored 90 and 98, so no need to worry about Broughton.

 

Krak won't start as the sub 2 weeks in a row, will lose match fitness

 

I agree with Fez, highly unlikely to see Krak start as sub 2 weeks in a row, plus it is a Friday night game so you should be able to see if he is named sub before lock out right?

 

@ vortex 08,

Broughton scored 90 on the road and backed it up with 98 in a loss to Geelong. Considering there were only a handful of 100+ppg DEF players last year, he is a definite keeper and will only increase in price (from his current 94ppg avg) and as someone who had Enright last year, just wait until Geelong plays other contenders for the top 4 (not discounting St Kilda, but he was on the Tiprat who isn't the most defensively minded FWD) and see the FWD tag put on him.
Enright sets up so much for Geelong and other teams know this, so he burnt a lot of us last year towards the business end of the season (Rnds 15-18 in particular). that being said, Broughton isn't exactly reliable either but not worth a sideways trade for a couple of bucks when you won't really get to use it unless you trade out Enright in 3 weeks time.

 

I have krak, richardson, dangerfield & Matera am thinking I should get Tapscott in but don't know if its worth the trade, thoughts?

 

I thought the reason Krak was the sub was because he lacked match fitness anyway?

 

Guys, to bring Tapscott in, i have to get rid of either Richardson, Prestia or Matera...

I agree on Broughton too... trading him to Enright is a sideways trade and it is not that Broughton has been too disappointing with his scores.