I didn't see the game so am wondering why Luke's score is so high from 14 posessions: 35 L.Tapscott 15 11 4 1 0 104 83 0 4 4 1 2 3 2 7 9 2 0 87% I have him in my team so I'm not complaining. Compare his stats to Nathan Jones: 2 N.Jones 28 12 16 1 0 91 93 1 3 1 3 2 0 1 7 21 4 1 75% I would have thought Nathan would have a higher score??
not sure what all the stats mean but effienceny is higher, had simular amount of kicks, compare the tackles and contested possies/marks, score involvments should give you a good indication
Tapscott got a lot of ball early in the game when the contest was on. IIRC he was leading the way in SC scores at half time. That has to count for something once the weighting is put in place at the end of the game.
Yeah maybe some Junk Time action from other players. Tapscott BOG when the game was there to be won - a quarter and a half.
Probably neither this week , and then it would depend on how they go next week. Looking into the future, maybe darling goes first because tappys ton will last longer. But if trading now, maybe tappy? Who knows really.
Matera would go before the both of them you'd think. Possibly downgrade him to Tom Lynch next week if the big man can keep it up.