adcock vs. shaw

Discussion in 'AFL' started by knotty29, May 13, 2011.

  1. knotty29

    knotty29 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    any opinions would be great.

    have a bit of cash to upgrade injured Grimes. Thinking of pros and cons of both shaw and adcock.

    adcock: also injury prone, shite team but been playing real well.

    shaw: been playing really well last 4 rounds, slightly cheaper but may draw that defensive tag and get scores of like 50 similar to last year.


    thoughts?
     
  2. whips

    whips New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nothing between them.
    If playing for league only, Shaw has a bye to come while Adcock's next bye is a league bye.
     
  3. shaken

    shaken New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Same dilemma. Also considered Delidio. Ended up going with Adcock in the end.
     
  4. swerva3

    swerva3 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    Assume you all have Enright?
    Shaw on my upgrade list but not until after his next bye. Adcock worries me so staying away.
     
  5. knotty29

    knotty29 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    yeah maybe il do the same and go adcock and wait a while on shaw. adcock has burnt me the last 2 years though....3rd time lucky.
     
  6. Nick

    Nick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    189
    Adcock runs a lot through the midfield but is injury prone.

    Shaw can go big but if given tagging attention can go small also. Fwd tags seem to be less frequent this year.

    I'd go Adcock now and Shaw after his 2nd bye.
     

Share This Page