2012 ruck options

Discussion in 'AFL' started by Knucklebusters, Jan 29, 2012.

  1. port_leschenault

    port_leschenault Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,714
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Oh yeah, I agree with Ruddy about McCauley. With Hale and (hopefully) Roughead we have two players who can support Bailey. Only way I see McCauley getting off the rookie list is if Bailey goes down (strong possibility). Then it would be a case of him v Lowden.
     
  2. Dirty_Whorks

    Dirty_Whorks New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is anyone else extremely suspicious that SKT hasn't mentioned McEvoy at all? I can see SKT sitting back, wringing his hands in delight. McEvoy... McEvoy... McEvoy...
     
  3. Lucas

    Lucas Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,974
    Likes Received:
    121
    McEvoy is locked into R1 in my team FWIW.
     
  4. port_leschenault

    port_leschenault Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,714
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Yeah, what the ex-General said.
     
  5. 11kgm

    11kgm New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    For me one superstar looking at Sandi/Cox one mid price West/McIntosh and two rookies Giles/Big O.
     
  6. Benny

    Benny New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm thinking of going Mumford + Leuenberger with Giles + Stephenson covering. The Main issue is none of them have the bye in round 13
     
  7. zeddog

    zeddog New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    A couple of names here that I'm not seeing much of

    1. Kruezer
    2. Renouf

    Particularly Renouf given his price and potential for #1 Ruck at Port (please correct me if I'm wrong)
    How about :
    Renouf as #2 Ruck
    Average last year of 57, Priced at $248k

    Thoughts? Viable #2 Ruck and use cash elsewhere?
     
  8. buzz

    buzz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    2-0-2 a possibility this year for moi. I haven't forgotten how well the rucks scored last year under a slightly different sc system. There are some good cheapies and the holy grail of 2 set and forget ruckman would be a dream, but more likely an oasis.
     
  9. Hendy

    Hendy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    HMac would be amazing if it wasnt for Goldstein. Renouf may be a possibility.

    No love for Sandi is surprising.
     
  10. Bearfly

    Bearfly Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,405
    Likes Received:
    846
    <blockquote>Quote from zeddog on February 2, 2012, 15:33
    A couple of names here that I'm not seeing much of

    1. Kruezer
    2. Renouf

    Particularly Renouf given his price and potential for #1 Ruck at Port (please correct me if I'm wrong)
    How about :
    Renouf as #2 Ruck
    Average last year of 57, Priced at &#36;248k

    Thoughts? Viable #2 Ruck and use cash elsewhere?</blockquote>

    Can tell you now that Renouf will only be #1 ruck at Port during the time Lobbe is out - and Port expect Lobbe to be right by Round 4 at the latest, with a chance he'll be good to go by Round 1.

    Lobbe is Primus's 1st choice ruckman and Renouf was traded in to provide cover and back-up with Brogan gone and Redden, Curnow & Webb still learning their craft
     
  11. ArthurDent

    ArthurDent New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    <blockquote>Quote from zeddog on February 2, 2012, 15:33
    A couple of names here that I'm not seeing much of

    1. Kruezer
    2. Renouf

    Particularly Renouf given his price and potential for #1 Ruck at Port (please correct me if I'm wrong)
    How about :
    Renouf as #2 Ruck
    Average last year of 57, Priced at &#36;248k

    Thoughts? Viable #2 Ruck and use cash elsewhere?</blockquote>





    I am currently looking at J Sellar as a ruck option 229k will play, ruck/def

    and also looking at Daw as an bench player should have game time this year



     
  12. lezyeoh

    lezyeoh New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Arthur, don't follow your heart. ;)
    Its a big risk to put 229K for a ruck when he hasn't proven himself at AFL level.
    And whether he'll fit into ou backline is also yet to be seen.
    Just saying.
     
  13. port_leschenault

    port_leschenault Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,714
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    <blockquote>Quote from zeddog on February 2, 2012, 15:33
    A couple of names here that I'm not seeing much of

    1. Kruezer
    2. Renouf

    Particularly Renouf given his price and potential for #1 Ruck at Port (please correct me if I'm wrong)
    How about :
    Renouf as #2 Ruck
    Average last year of 57, Priced at &#36;248k

    Thoughts? Viable #2 Ruck and use cash elsewhere?</blockquote>

    Even as #1 in a premiership side at Hawthorn, Renouf only managed to average 60. He has a very low ceiling. Do not go there!
     
  14. graeme

    graeme Guest

    I am thinking:
    1. Nic Nat
    2. Kruezer
    3. Giles
    4. Stephenson

    with Rowe as my #7 forward. Means playing 2 and 4 in week 11, 1 and 2 in week 12, and 1 and 3 in week 13. Rowe gives an out for injury through the forard line.

    Assumes the rookies play (crosses fingers and toes).

    Any thoughts on the approach of going with the up and comers and investing heavily in mids?

    regards
    chels
     
  15. crew

    crew New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mummy is my #1. Bloke is a superstar. McCauley had to be recruited for more than 4th ruck spot. The fact that Voss let him go means the bloke will go places in my humble opinion ( Voss has done nothing right so far ...........And will continue with that theme). Still I am by no means up to speed with the season but will be watching him in the NAB like a hungry vulture.
     
  16. HeavyMen

    HeavyMen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    936
    Likes Received:
    318
    Im thinking along these lines

    Leuenberger
    Kreuzer
    Giles
    Big O

    Rowe F7

    Keepers have 1st & 3rd bye rounds giving me plenty of weeks to fatten Giles & Big O to upgrade to Roughie or someone else.
     
  17. Bearfly

    Bearfly Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,405
    Likes Received:
    846
    Am having 2nd thoughts about using Rowe as F7 now after hearing about his shoulder injury (not sure how bad it is).

    Some tinkering with the team for sure now!!!
     
  18. JPK

    JPK Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    4,781
    Likes Received:
    3,308
    Mummy, Leuey, or McEvoy ???
     
  19. Nick

    Nick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    189
    I would go McEvoy, but lets see how the new coach uses him. Rucks (especially R1 and R2) are going to do my head in this year, I can see it now. R3 and R4 look fairly consistent.

    I think a 1:3 split in the rucks could be dangerous, especially that we all saw ruck scores inflate considerably last year with the sub rule introduced. Personally I don't think I could risk Giles at R2. We'll see in the NAB.

    Interesting very little talk about Sex on the Beach. Could even be a unique!
     
  20. tonyc

    tonyc New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    2
    Guys, it may have already been addressed elsewhere (and if so, my apologies), but I have a question for the gurus here. I recall that last year Champion Data made a change to ruck (tap to advantage) scoring that meant ruckmen's scores for the year were inflated. There was talk that they would rectify this scoring anomoly this year - has it happened?

    Of course, this doesn't help in terms of who you choose, as the relativities of ruck scores will be maintained, it's just that they ahould all come down a little, suggesting SC scores across the board won't be as high this year. Or am I completely missing the point?
     

Share This Page