I have a question on a couple of players. Dangerfield or Sloane for one position and the other Selwood or Rockliff or Redden?
"Dangerfield or Sloane for one position". You should not be considering this. If at all it would be Dangerfield for FWD and Sloane for MID. As a general rule, your midfield prems should all be dedicated mids, not MPP. Coin toss between Rockliff and Redden, which probably comes down to budget. If you are thinking along these lines then maybe you should consider at least a 4 prem midfield so that it becomes a question of Selwood and Rockliff or Redden.
My Mid is atm Ablett, Boyd, Rockcliff (was selwood) Danger, smith, miles, McDonald and Couch. I was going 3 premiums one break out and the rest rookies
Please read the post above again. Dangerfield should be FWD and good luck with the breakout. Selwood (currently) still represents better value than Boyd.
then you are probably forcing a player into a position where he wont be elite, but if you had him in the forward he could be (if he scored the same points) to be a keeper for mids he needs to earn more than for the forward line, thus why people dont really wish to put many/any fwd-mid players in the mids as theyre likely not 'elite' (eg. like pendles, ablett, swan, etc)