the Luenberger dilemma

Discussion in 'AFL' started by shaghar, Apr 17, 2012.

  1. shaghar

    shaghar New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know it was kinda a stupid call but thought his pre-season was acceptable, that been said he's gone for at least 6 weeks. So now what? My other 3 rucks are Hale, Giles and Redden. I also have Fyfe in my team, arrrgghhh :eek:


    Anyone got some ideas, im a bit stumped at the moment

    Thanks in advance

    Shags
     
  2. Rufus

    Rufus New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lot of cash to have on your bench for 6weeks. I would trade.
     
  3. stowie

    stowie Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    818
    Likes Received:
    622
    Trade for sure, 6 weeks is a long time.
     
  4. H_Dons

    H_Dons New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    349
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ryder looks the goods...wish I picked him! Or hold out another week for Cox to get even cheaper :)
     
  5. AngryAnt

    AngryAnt New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trade down to Longer and play Giles, perhaps upgrading Hale to Cox or Sandilands in a few weeks.
     
  6. Ryder or Sandi should both get a good look, if Sandi keeps his average up he will increase in price next week by around 10k, Ryder 15k
     
  7. Senator96

    Senator96 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    177
    6 weeks is definetly too long then he still has to work his way back into form when he comes back plus the timeshare factor with hudson/longer and on top of that his price will crash when he starts playing again until the weekends score gets out of his cycle.

    He can be pretty much directly swapped with jacobs from the crows whos a good option if you wanted to swap him for another premium. Or you could ditch him for stephenson or longer himself if you wanted to get your hands on some cash.
     
  8. shaghar

    shaghar New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    thanks for the replys Guys , few things to think about for sure

    What about Kreuzer do you think thats a option or for that fact Jacobs i guess they are very similar options

    or

    I dont mind the Downgrade to Longer aswell , he is sure to get more game time now and work a Cox/Sandilands into the team in a few weeks

    or

    I do have some cash in the bank tho Trading Luenberger out gives me 691 k Do i bite the bullet and put put a premium in and play the set and forget game :)

    decisions decisions

     
  9. TopHeavy

    TopHeavy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    0
    Definitely trade him out. I stuck with Jamar last year when they said 4 and it turned out to be 6 or 7. I'd personally dg to Stephenson. He hasnt had his price rise yet so you're lucky there. Hale and Giles looks acceptable until you get cox/sandi when they bottom out. If you want something a little more upmarket McIntosh or Kreuzer are safe bets!
     
  10. BennyA

    BennyA New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    What is people's opinions on jacobs vs mcintosh? Not much separating them now, besides 100k. Both have good draws and plenty if improvement.
     

Share This Page