(not sure if this has been asked before, i'm new here) Let's say u have Rookie A, but Rookie B (whom you don't have) looks like he's going to score better and finish with a higher peak value... how much more would Rookie B have to peak in price over Rookie A (expected peak) for it to be worth using a trade to move from A to B??? My estimate would be about 180k to justify using a trade to go from 1 to another. What do you guys think?
i reckon you are about spot on with that estimate. in some cases less could be justifyable too. last year, Walesy wrote a good piece about the value of trades. and came to the conclusion that for a trade to be worthwhile, it should get you $200k. but that was last season, and things are different this year. I havent done any proper research into it, but i reckon it may be lower this year... To catch rookies rising on their first rise, i think I may be offloading other rookies before they get to the $200k increase, just to get upgraded asap.