Hi guys, Need some help splitting these two for my shaw replacement. Slightly leaning towards birchall for some reason. Thoughts??
Suckling cheaper $424,800 v $436,500 and averages more 97 v 95 and has a lower BE 102 v 152. Not sure if that helps decision making? Wouldn't have thought either would be up for a rest with the Hawks injury list at the moment.
Neither of the two will be getting rested. As Kel mentioned the injury crisis doesnt give Clarko the luxury of resting key players(especially down back) so both will play out the remainder of the season with the clubs last bye just gone. If it was me i'd be going with Suckling. Birchall at times will be required to do a lock down role on key forwards whereas Suckling gives the Hawks much needed rebound out of there defensive 50
I already have Suckling and am looking at Birchall as an additional back and/or replacement should an injury occur. Both would be good additions, probably Suckling over Birchall very slightly IMHO my 2 cents, YMMV etc, etc