<div>[span style='font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: 18.1875px; background-color: #ffffff;]Just read this on the SC site <strong style='font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant: normal; line-height: 18.1875px; background-color: #ffffff;]UPDATE:[/b]Blicavs, previously classified as a midfielder only, has now had his position updated and can be selected as a ruck/mid.
Lenh191 wrote: <div>[span style='font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: 18.1875px; background-color: #ffffff; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;]Just read this on the SC site <strong style='font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant: normal; line-height: 18.1875px; background-color: #ffffff;]UPDATE:[/b]Blicavs, previously classified as a midfielder only, has now had his position updated and can be selected as a ruck/mid. Wow! That will surely change quite a few teams. Thanks for the heads up.
Well I'll be damned, VS invented R/M to cover up for the quality control lapse which saw Blicavs given MID only status. Guess it isn't just the Hun who have poor quality control. Now along with D/R (only Cam Pedersen has this), we also have R/M - both almost completely useless DPP categories.
Jason wrote:...both almost completely useless DPP categories. Very almost completely useless Guess they had to keep him a Mid as he'd already be in a bunch of teams.
I went with almost completely useless, because conceivably you could potentially activate these DPP options mid-trade perhaps and swing the D/R or R/M player between lines at this time. Not a great use it must be said.