Hey all, Wondering what people are doing with one Nick Mal 'not so sexy'?? Started the season well enough as Sydney's go-to man, averging 93 in the first 4 weeks and justifying all those who thought he was underpriced. Copped a knock in round 5, was subbed, and has a highest score of 83 since. His last 5 weeks he has averaged just 64 (71 not counting sub), culminating in a 44 last week to be priced just below his starting price ($366,900). So, are people going to ride it out and save the trade (he has already lost all the coin he is going to and noone else in his price range has his scoring potential) Or bite the bullet and upgrade him? (If so, who to?)
If he's your no.1 problem right now, then give him the flick But i'm personally giving him two weeks to prove himself, then may possibly trade him out during the byes (regardless of price drop)
<blockquote>Quote from Senator96 on May 31, 2012, 13:38 yeah id hold him too, at least hes playing. It could be worse you could have sam fisher. </blockquote> Welcome to my world.
Other teams shut him down. And shut the Swans down. Both were over-rated, now they are getting back to being sort of rated, ah well that's life.
<blockquote>Quote from jibba on May 31, 2012, 12:34 If he's your no.1 problem right now, then give him the flick But i'm personally giving him two weeks to prove himself, then may possibly trade him out during the byes (regardless of price drop) </blockquote> +1 I'm planning to trade one of Broughton or Malceski at their r12 bye. Have planned it to be Broughton all season, although Eski is putting his hand up now. I'll see what happens the next 2 weeks