(EDIT: trying with quote tags around links to see if that makes a difference for viewing for others) Saw this: <blockquote>http://www.sportsnewsfirst.com.au/articles/2011/06/21/now-pavlich-a-fremantle-casualty/ </blockquote> rumour-mill article yesterday although I use that term very loosely, because there is nothing substantive to back the claims. I call bullshit. This article from the Fremantle club website: <blockquote>http://www.fremantlefc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/7009/newsid/116703/default.aspx </blockquote> at least has a quote from Pavlich himself saying that the foot issue would not prevent him from playing this weekend. But does anyone have anything more conclusive either way?
Can't explain Sainter, other than what browser are you using? Are you using Internet Explorer? If so, there are much better browsers out there to choose from - looks fine to me in Firefox.
Yeah i had to 'quote' your post to be able to read it as well Jason. What jason said without the links Saw this: (Article link in original post) rumour-mill article yesterday although I use that term very loosely, because there is nothing substantive to back the claims. I call bullshit. This article from the Fremantle club website (Article link in original post) At least has a quote from Pavlich himself saying that the foot issue would not prevent him from playing this weekend. But does anyone have anything more conclusive either way?
Anyway Pav coming out and saying he has no problem makes me sleep abit easier "Pavlich said he had no concerns about a foot injury after being stood on against Melbourne"
That's good news, lets hope it isn't something he carries for a month and then has to have surgery or something like that! @ Jason, I had the same thing happen to me, tried IE and Chrome and didn't make a difference to the post. I ended up hitting enter where the line should've finished to make it readable.
Pav and Sandi playing this week could be the saving grace for my team! Hopefully it all comes together. Freo have been torn apart by injuries this season, real shame.
Heard on SEN that they will name Pav, but still make a decision closer to gameday, so make sure that you have cover!
Takes me back to rnd 14, 2009. Pav had a calf strain that was 'right to go' missed 3 weeks. I went from 26th,to 98th, to 212th, 240th in the three weeks he ended up being out, holding him. Stuck in my mind a bit.
Pretty awful set of circumstances in 2009 for you Pink Batts. I went from P2/P3 in 2008 losing Milburn late for a week, Chapman for about 3 with a hammy, Ablett's 3 forced me to trade when I'd prefer to stick, and then the coupdegrace was the "retirement" of Didak and Shaw with that car incident. Missed the top 10 by a handful of points, missed the win by about 350.
<blockquote>Quote from obleex on June 23, 2011, 12:41 Pav tweeted saying he pulled up well from training. That plus Sandi being back is good news for me!</blockquote> Awesome News!
<blockquote>Quote from Lucas on June 23, 2011, 14:14 Pretty awful set of circumstances in 2009 for you Pink Batts. I went from P2/P3 in 2008 losing Milburn late for a week, Chapman for about 3 with a hammy, Ablett's 3 forced me to trade when I'd prefer to stick, and then the coupdegrace was the "retirement" of Didak and Shaw with that car incident. Missed the top 10 by a handful of points, missed the win by about 350.</blockquote> Ahh man that is stiff!! You would of been spewing! =\\
Well thing is most had to cover these options; thing is I'd gone a bit earlier on trades so I got caught out. Some years the leader is lucky, some years they aren't. And the Ablett to Kirk trade was the killer. Should have gone Bartel, would have lost by a handful. But I still won $1k that year so you can hardly be upset LOL!