Rate My Team - Final Edition for 2014

Discussion in 'Blog' started by Jason, Mar 13, 2014.

By Jason on Mar 13, 2014 at 11:00 AM
  1. Jason

    Jason Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    3,810
    Likes Received:
    1,418
    Great discussion again last week.  But the time has come to stop sitting on the fence and actually back your PODs in.
    Here's the team that I have arrived at and why I've made certain changes over the past week:
    <strong style='font-size: 14px;]Defenders:[/b]
    OUT: Hanley, Georgiou
    IN: Walker, Cutler
    I went cold on Hanley after suspecting that it might happen. &#160;D8 could revert to Georgiou or potentially becomes Clurey. &#160;For now, I have Cutler ahead in terms of potential SC output and (slightly) better job security. &#160;Georgiou probably doesn't play after Garland returns. &#160;Clurey (if named for R1) could be in trouble when Trengove returns.
    <strong style='font-size: 14px;]Midfielders:[/b]
    OUT: Ablett, Crouch
    IN: Watson, Lemmens
    Ablett still has a band-aid. &#160;He may come back in, but for now I'm running Ablett-free. &#160;M8 is similar to D8, in that it could easily revert to M.Crouch or possibly Robertson depending on final teams. &#160;I think Grigg is ahead of M.Crouch to play R1. &#160;Lemmens on the other hand, I like for R1 and beyond.
    <strong style='font-size: 14px;]Rucks:[/b]
    OUT: Minson
    IN: Lobbe
    Need the cash elsewhere. &#160;Not 100% convinced that Lobbe is a keeper yet, but I can't see him losing value on his start price and there is a decent enough chance that he goes up significantly due to having a full pre-season (for the first time) and not having any real internal competition for SC pie at Port Adelaide.
    Forwards:
    OUT: Parker, Mitchell, Rohan
    IN: Martin, Wingard, McDonough
    Upgraded to more likely keepers. &#160;Would be lucky if both Parker and Mitchell started in my SC team and rose from mid-price to elite in the same year. &#160;Sure it might happen, but history says I'm not THAT lucky when it comes to picking SC players. &#160;McDonough in a half-back role should score better than Rohan, especially if he keeps up his pre-season form.
    /Portals/0/Users/222/74/4574/RMT%20Round%204.PNG' style='width: 684px; height: 817px;
    With $70k in hand, I'm comfortable that I have enough cash to make adjustments in the second week of R1 without needing to radically alter the team structure.
    And with a 9-10-11 bye structure, I'm very happy with the starting lineup from that perspective.
    So jump into the comments below, tell me where I have it wrong, why your team will win the overall, etc.
    [span style='font-size: 14px; color: #444444;]For those who haven't previously seen the ground rules on how RMT works, please note the following which apply to comments in this thread:
    <p style='color: #444444; background-color: #fcfcfc; margin-bottom: 10px;]1. &#160;In order to get feedback on your own team, you must first provide feedback on the teams that have been recently posted. &#160;This is the golden rule and is what makes this whole thing work.
    <p style='color: #444444; background-color: #fcfcfc; margin-bottom: 10px;]2. &#160;If you just post your team without giving any feedback,&#160;your post will be deleted. &#160;
    <p style='color: #444444; background-color: #fcfcfc; margin-bottom: 10px;]3. &#160;Please refrain from commenting on teams that have been posted by others that have not followed the golden rule.
    <p style='color: #444444; background-color: #fcfcfc; margin-bottom: 10px;]4. &#160;Keep it civil. &#160;Constructive criticism is fine. &#160;But there is a line and please don't cross it.
     

Comments

Discussion in 'Blog' started by Jason, Mar 13, 2014.

Share This Page