TooSerious
For those who take it way too seriously
One of the litle side games that has taken off in the forums here is the Trading game. The idea is that everyone decides on and starts with the same starting team, so that we can see who pulls the better trades throughout the season.
What I didnt expect to see though, is a 180 point score differencial based solely on Captain and Bench selection- Particularly when 6 GC rookies and Hibberd brought the made it that only a handful of players were in range to be benched.
This highlights to me just how important it is, in the early day, to get your captain and bench selections just right! heck, 180 points is the difference right now between a top 50 start and a top 7,000 start, or a top 7,000 start and a top 50,000 start.
In short, it can make a huge difference to your standings until youve got your team upgraded.
<!--more-->
So, lets take a look at some good princibles in selecting your onfield rookies, and where better a place to start than <a href="http://tooserious.net/ticker.php">the Ticker[/url].
Firstly, lets take a looks at the big scores from last week.
Robbie Tarrant 119: Looking at the ticker, we can see that West Coast give up points to opposition defenders (well, everyone except rucks really!) - which certainly would have helped here.
Ed Curnow 118: Again, Richmond leak points to each of the oppositions players, except for defenders (Ball not down there enough? *zing* Tigers fans!)
Cam Pedersen 114: While technically playing in the ruck, he was given the job of letting Cox run free so that he could as well. Had he played tighter on Cox, dare I say, his scores would have reflected that.
Luke Tapscott 113: This was impressive- Sydney have long been regarded a SuperCoach kryponite- however, a closer look at their chart reveals that they give up an average amount of points to defenders. Still, a debut ton against an "average" tick is nothing to be sneezed at.
Nick Lower 110: Brisbane are running HOT in...
What I didnt expect to see though, is a 180 point score differencial based solely on Captain and Bench selection- Particularly when 6 GC rookies and Hibberd brought the made it that only a handful of players were in range to be benched.
This highlights to me just how important it is, in the early day, to get your captain and bench selections just right! heck, 180 points is the difference right now between a top 50 start and a top 7,000 start, or a top 7,000 start and a top 50,000 start.
In short, it can make a huge difference to your standings until youve got your team upgraded.
<!--more-->
So, lets take a look at some good princibles in selecting your onfield rookies, and where better a place to start than <a href="http://tooserious.net/ticker.php">the Ticker[/url].
Firstly, lets take a looks at the big scores from last week.
Robbie Tarrant 119: Looking at the ticker, we can see that West Coast give up points to opposition defenders (well, everyone except rucks really!) - which certainly would have helped here.
Ed Curnow 118: Again, Richmond leak points to each of the oppositions players, except for defenders (Ball not down there enough? *zing* Tigers fans!)
Cam Pedersen 114: While technically playing in the ruck, he was given the job of letting Cox run free so that he could as well. Had he played tighter on Cox, dare I say, his scores would have reflected that.
Luke Tapscott 113: This was impressive- Sydney have long been regarded a SuperCoach kryponite- however, a closer look at their chart reveals that they give up an average amount of points to defenders. Still, a debut ton against an "average" tick is nothing to be sneezed at.
Nick Lower 110: Brisbane are running HOT in...
Another article from our most awesome community here, this time its by Ruddy who takes a closer look at the effects that the sub has had on the 3300 rule.
Hey guys, Ruddy here.
For those of you who werent on TS much over the pre-season, there was a debate in the forum about whether the introduction of the sub would mean that the 3300 rule needs to be altered.
First, i will go through the theoretical side of this article.
Before the sub rule, in each game there were 44 players scoring an average of 75, for a total of 3300. However, now that there are subs, 4 of those 44 players only play (on average) half a game. Using simple logic, we can see that these four players, having played only half a game each, will average half of what they would if they played a full game. So they will average somewhere around 37.5.
<!--more-->
Under the 3300 rule, these four players are expected to average 75 for a total of 300 points between them. However, since they only average 37.5 between them, they will only have a total of 150 points. This results in an extra 150 points per match for the non-subs to pick up. This means about an extra 3 to 4 points for each non-sub player, on average.
This, of course, is all theoretical. Now i will go through what actually happened in round 1. And before anyone says it, i know it is a small sample size, but it is all the data available, and the statistics are pretty convincing.
In round 1, there were 32 players involved with the sub rule, whether they were subbed on, or subbed off. Together, these 32 players managed to score 1242 points, for an average of 38.8. Pretty close to the theoretical average of 37.5.
So where did the extra points go? Since there were still 3300 points allocated per game, the extra 145 (approx) points went to the other players in the game at an average of 3.6 points per player.
Over round 1, there were 26409 points scored total. By subtracting the points scored by subs, we...
Hey guys, Ruddy here.
For those of you who werent on TS much over the pre-season, there was a debate in the forum about whether the introduction of the sub would mean that the 3300 rule needs to be altered.
First, i will go through the theoretical side of this article.
Before the sub rule, in each game there were 44 players scoring an average of 75, for a total of 3300. However, now that there are subs, 4 of those 44 players only play (on average) half a game. Using simple logic, we can see that these four players, having played only half a game each, will average half of what they would if they played a full game. So they will average somewhere around 37.5.
<!--more-->
Under the 3300 rule, these four players are expected to average 75 for a total of 300 points between them. However, since they only average 37.5 between them, they will only have a total of 150 points. This results in an extra 150 points per match for the non-subs to pick up. This means about an extra 3 to 4 points for each non-sub player, on average.
This, of course, is all theoretical. Now i will go through what actually happened in round 1. And before anyone says it, i know it is a small sample size, but it is all the data available, and the statistics are pretty convincing.
In round 1, there were 32 players involved with the sub rule, whether they were subbed on, or subbed off. Together, these 32 players managed to score 1242 points, for an average of 38.8. Pretty close to the theoretical average of 37.5.
So where did the extra points go? Since there were still 3300 points allocated per game, the extra 145 (approx) points went to the other players in the game at an average of 3.6 points per player.
Over round 1, there were 26409 points scored total. By subtracting the points scored by subs, we...
Thursday night- you know what that means!!!
First of all, a summary of the fantasy relevant ins and outs.
INS: Petrie, Kerr, Watson, Wallis, Chapman, Polec, McCauley, Ellis, Hodge
OUTS Pederson, LeCras, Pitt, Wood
Extended: Ward, Wallis, liberatore, Beams, Polec, McCauley
Big Cam Pederson isnt a surprising out, but is certainly going to hurt a few, particularly if youre guilty of the cardinal sin- trading before the teams are out!
Wallis coming in could make him a tasty downgrade target come round 5 if he can keep up some form (and youre all feeling aggressive enough!)
Selwood has been named, but that still doesnt mean hes a lock- they do have 3 emergencies ready to step into his spot if he isnt ready.
Finally, we get to see the GC squad! No Coad named, but Prestia being in the squad will certainly make a few smile- though that could easily turn into a frown if hes nominated as the sub!
<!--more-->
GOLD COAST SUNS
B: Seb Tape, Nathan Bock, Campbell Brown
HB: Jarrod Harbrow, Karmichael Hunt, Nathan Krakouer
C: Trent McKenzie, Daniel Harris, Michael Rischitelli
HF: Daniel Stanley, Charlie Dixon, Alik Magin
F: Jared Brennan, Zac Smith, Brandon Matera
Foll: Josh Fraser, David Swallow, Gary Ablett
I/C: Marc Lock, Josh Toy, Harley Bennell, Dion Prestia
Emerg: Maverick Weller, Michael Coad, Daniel Gorringe
Carlton
B: Jordan Russell, Bret Thornton, Matthew Watson
HB: Nick Duigan, Simon White, Jeremy Laidler
C: Kade Simpson, Chris Judd, Heath Scotland
HF: Jeffrey Garlett, Jarrad Waite, Christopher Yarran
F: Eddie Betts, Shaun Hampson, Andrew Walker
Foll: Robert Warnock, Marc Murphy, Bryce Gibbs
I/C: Andrew Carrazzo, Dennis Armfield, Mitch Robinson, Edward Curnow
Emg: David Ellard, Lachlan Henderson, Andrew Collins
St Kilda
B: Steven Baker, Zac Dawson, Raphael Clarke
HB: Sam Gilbert, Sam Fisher, Brendon Goddard
C: Jason Gram, Lenny Hayes, Leigh Montagna
HF: David Armitage, Nick Riewoldt, Brett Peake
F: Nick...
First of all, a summary of the fantasy relevant ins and outs.
INS: Petrie, Kerr, Watson, Wallis, Chapman, Polec, McCauley, Ellis, Hodge
OUTS Pederson, LeCras, Pitt, Wood
Extended: Ward, Wallis, liberatore, Beams, Polec, McCauley
Big Cam Pederson isnt a surprising out, but is certainly going to hurt a few, particularly if youre guilty of the cardinal sin- trading before the teams are out!
Wallis coming in could make him a tasty downgrade target come round 5 if he can keep up some form (and youre all feeling aggressive enough!)
Selwood has been named, but that still doesnt mean hes a lock- they do have 3 emergencies ready to step into his spot if he isnt ready.
Finally, we get to see the GC squad! No Coad named, but Prestia being in the squad will certainly make a few smile- though that could easily turn into a frown if hes nominated as the sub!
<!--more-->
GOLD COAST SUNS
B: Seb Tape, Nathan Bock, Campbell Brown
HB: Jarrod Harbrow, Karmichael Hunt, Nathan Krakouer
C: Trent McKenzie, Daniel Harris, Michael Rischitelli
HF: Daniel Stanley, Charlie Dixon, Alik Magin
F: Jared Brennan, Zac Smith, Brandon Matera
Foll: Josh Fraser, David Swallow, Gary Ablett
I/C: Marc Lock, Josh Toy, Harley Bennell, Dion Prestia
Emerg: Maverick Weller, Michael Coad, Daniel Gorringe
Carlton
B: Jordan Russell, Bret Thornton, Matthew Watson
HB: Nick Duigan, Simon White, Jeremy Laidler
C: Kade Simpson, Chris Judd, Heath Scotland
HF: Jeffrey Garlett, Jarrad Waite, Christopher Yarran
F: Eddie Betts, Shaun Hampson, Andrew Walker
Foll: Robert Warnock, Marc Murphy, Bryce Gibbs
I/C: Andrew Carrazzo, Dennis Armfield, Mitch Robinson, Edward Curnow
Emg: David Ellard, Lachlan Henderson, Andrew Collins
St Kilda
B: Steven Baker, Zac Dawson, Raphael Clarke
HB: Sam Gilbert, Sam Fisher, Brendon Goddard
C: Jason Gram, Lenny Hayes, Leigh Montagna
HF: David Armitage, Nick Riewoldt, Brett Peake
F: Nick...
Howdy all - how good is it to have the footy back! Â A great week to kick off the season with a number of close games and a few upsets too.
As Walesy recently reminded us all, 2011 is the chance to have your say on who will pick up votes as the rounds roll on - and it looks as if many of you have already done so. Â Along with your aggregate picks, Ill also be giving my opinion too. Â This years formula has been tweaked to allow for players who have polled well in recent times, as I mentioned in my previous post. Â Without further ado, here are the predictions for round 1
<!--more-->
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Carlton v Richmond
Too Serious Votes:
B. Gibbs (3)
M. Murphy (2)
C. Judd (1)
Holeys Votes:
B. Gibbs (3)
M. Murphy (2)
J. Riewoldt (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Geelong v St Kilda
TS:
J. Bartel (3)
L. Hayes (2)
C. Enright (1)
Holey:
L. Hayes (3)
J. Bartel (2)
H. Taylor (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Collingwood v Port Adelaide
TS:
D. Swan (3)
B. Johnson (2)
S. Pendlebury (1)
Holey:
D. Swan (3)
C. Dawes (2)
B. Johnson (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Adelaide v Hawthorn
TS:
S. Mitchell (3)
P. Dangerfield (2)
S. Stevens (1)
Holey:
S. Mitchell (3)
B. Reilly (2)
P. Dangerfield (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Fremantle v Brisbane
TS:
A. Sandilands (3)
S. Black (2)
N. Fyfe (1)
Holey:
A. Sandilands (3)
S. Black (2)
N. Fyfe (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Essendon v Western Bulldogs
TS:
J. Watson (3)
D. Hille (2)
P. Ryder (1)
Holey:
D. Hille (3)
J. Watson (2)
B. Stanton (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Melbourne v Sydney
TS:
R. OKeefe (3)
B. Moloney (2)
J. Bolton (1)
Holey:
R. OKeefe (3)
B. Moloney (2)
C. Sylvia (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">West Coast v North Melbourne
TS:
D. Cox (3)
A. Swallow (2)
M. Priddis (1)
Holey:
D. Cox (3)
A....
As Walesy recently reminded us all, 2011 is the chance to have your say on who will pick up votes as the rounds roll on - and it looks as if many of you have already done so. Â Along with your aggregate picks, Ill also be giving my opinion too. Â This years formula has been tweaked to allow for players who have polled well in recent times, as I mentioned in my previous post. Â Without further ado, here are the predictions for round 1
<!--more-->
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Carlton v Richmond
Too Serious Votes:
B. Gibbs (3)
M. Murphy (2)
C. Judd (1)
Holeys Votes:
B. Gibbs (3)
M. Murphy (2)
J. Riewoldt (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Geelong v St Kilda
TS:
J. Bartel (3)
L. Hayes (2)
C. Enright (1)
Holey:
L. Hayes (3)
J. Bartel (2)
H. Taylor (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Collingwood v Port Adelaide
TS:
D. Swan (3)
B. Johnson (2)
S. Pendlebury (1)
Holey:
D. Swan (3)
C. Dawes (2)
B. Johnson (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Adelaide v Hawthorn
TS:
S. Mitchell (3)
P. Dangerfield (2)
S. Stevens (1)
Holey:
S. Mitchell (3)
B. Reilly (2)
P. Dangerfield (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Fremantle v Brisbane
TS:
A. Sandilands (3)
S. Black (2)
N. Fyfe (1)
Holey:
A. Sandilands (3)
S. Black (2)
N. Fyfe (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Essendon v Western Bulldogs
TS:
J. Watson (3)
D. Hille (2)
P. Ryder (1)
Holey:
D. Hille (3)
J. Watson (2)
B. Stanton (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">Melbourne v Sydney
TS:
R. OKeefe (3)
B. Moloney (2)
J. Bolton (1)
Holey:
R. OKeefe (3)
B. Moloney (2)
C. Sylvia (1)
[span style="text-decoration: underline">West Coast v North Melbourne
TS:
D. Cox (3)
A. Swallow (2)
M. Priddis (1)
Holey:
D. Cox (3)
A....
Alright, its had a few teething issues, but I reckon our end-o-lockout process is now looking like it should be working well.
So Ive just got a couple of pointers from around the site to remind you all of:
<a href="http://tooserious.net/brownlow.php">The brownlow tool[/url]: If you want to jump in with the fun of the brownlow, you should head over and <a href="http://tooserious.net/brownlow.php">enter in your tips[/url]- Holey will be doing his post soon, so youll want to get in quick! (And hey, keeping a log of your votes is much easier done the week you watched the games). And just to remind you all, we cleaned up with the bookies on this thing last year, so it could certainly pay to get involved! (ps- gamble responsibly, etc).
<!--more-->
<a href="http://tooserious.net/leagues.php">The Leagues[/url]: We pulled in our first batch of leagues tonight and it looks pretty good. Theres still a number of issues with the page, but on a whole, it looks pretty good. Remember though, you want to <a href="http://tooserious.net/leagues.php">get your leagues entered in ASAP[/url] (or at least before round 2 finishes), cause we need to track it from day one. One question that was raised, how do I get a tid? Well, if you go into your league, and hold your mouse over your opposition, the link that it goes to looks something like this- http://supercoach.heraldsun.com.au/?p=other_teams&lid=1&tid=11. If you read that, you can see that for that team, the tid=11. Just enter the 11 in.
<a href="http://tooserious.net/stats.php?sort=break_even&desc=asc">Breakevens[/url]: Just a reminder, breakevens dont come out until next week, but it couldnt hurt to take a looksee at which rookies look to be heading in the right direction.
Trading: Firstly, unless you have the Browndog, the Frenchman, or one of the other LTIs, just sit on your hands this week. If you disagree and reckon you have a trade that you just *need* to do, drop in a comment and well...
So Ive just got a couple of pointers from around the site to remind you all of:
<a href="http://tooserious.net/brownlow.php">The brownlow tool[/url]: If you want to jump in with the fun of the brownlow, you should head over and <a href="http://tooserious.net/brownlow.php">enter in your tips[/url]- Holey will be doing his post soon, so youll want to get in quick! (And hey, keeping a log of your votes is much easier done the week you watched the games). And just to remind you all, we cleaned up with the bookies on this thing last year, so it could certainly pay to get involved! (ps- gamble responsibly, etc).
<!--more-->
<a href="http://tooserious.net/leagues.php">The Leagues[/url]: We pulled in our first batch of leagues tonight and it looks pretty good. Theres still a number of issues with the page, but on a whole, it looks pretty good. Remember though, you want to <a href="http://tooserious.net/leagues.php">get your leagues entered in ASAP[/url] (or at least before round 2 finishes), cause we need to track it from day one. One question that was raised, how do I get a tid? Well, if you go into your league, and hold your mouse over your opposition, the link that it goes to looks something like this- http://supercoach.heraldsun.com.au/?p=other_teams&lid=1&tid=11. If you read that, you can see that for that team, the tid=11. Just enter the 11 in.
<a href="http://tooserious.net/stats.php?sort=break_even&desc=asc">Breakevens[/url]: Just a reminder, breakevens dont come out until next week, but it couldnt hurt to take a looksee at which rookies look to be heading in the right direction.
Trading: Firstly, unless you have the Browndog, the Frenchman, or one of the other LTIs, just sit on your hands this week. If you disagree and reckon you have a trade that you just *need* to do, drop in a comment and well...
Wow. How strange that 3 of the quarter finals had so much symmetry - the favourites starting strong, before their opponents put up massive scores down the stretch to jump in front on the last day today.
And they were our top 3 seeds that lost! Owen, Karlos and Heaver - you have all had really great seasons... And jasmine as well.  There were 5 teams that really set the pace all year, and now Micka is the only one left.
Ill jump straight into it this week - over the break are the reviews and previews as usual ::::
<!--more-->
Playoffs Week 1:
#8 <a title="Wade Machine (Daniel Laengst)" href="http://games.espn.go.com/fba/clubhouse?leagueId=23530&teamId=15&seasonId=2011" target="_top">Wade Machine[/url]Â 1400 v #1 <a title="Run TMC (Owen Beebe)" href="http://games.espn.go.com/fba/clubhouse?leagueId=23530&teamId=19&seasonId=2011" target="_top">Run TMC[/url]Â 1277
Most individual days in this one were tight, with only 3 days having margins greater than 25. Owen had a humongous day 3 with 485 points!! (Ruddy does that beat your record? I cant remember, but I think it does). Dan only won 2 days all up, including his huge final day - scoring 390 which put him in front for the first time all week. Neither team used a single acquisition, and both had about the same games played - Dan with 3 more than Owen, but if scores are averaged by games played, he still had more fppg anyway. Both teams had 6 players score tons and one each with a double; however Dan had 4 players between 80 and 100, compared to Owen with just 3 in that range.
Owens best were Dorrell Wright (202 from 4), Blake Griffen (178 from 3), Al Jefferson (150 from 4), Andre Miller (131 from 3), Rajon Rondo (130 from 3) and Chris Kaman (114 from 3); and Best for Dan were Dwayne Wade (235 from 3!!), Al Horford (160 from 4), Tony Allen (143 from 4), Carlos Delfino (122 from 3), Dirk Nowitzki (118 from 3) and Mike Conley (114 from 4).
#5 <a title="Jasmines Mob...
And they were our top 3 seeds that lost! Owen, Karlos and Heaver - you have all had really great seasons... And jasmine as well.  There were 5 teams that really set the pace all year, and now Micka is the only one left.
Ill jump straight into it this week - over the break are the reviews and previews as usual ::::
<!--more-->
Playoffs Week 1:
#8 <a title="Wade Machine (Daniel Laengst)" href="http://games.espn.go.com/fba/clubhouse?leagueId=23530&teamId=15&seasonId=2011" target="_top">Wade Machine[/url]Â 1400 v #1 <a title="Run TMC (Owen Beebe)" href="http://games.espn.go.com/fba/clubhouse?leagueId=23530&teamId=19&seasonId=2011" target="_top">Run TMC[/url]Â 1277
Most individual days in this one were tight, with only 3 days having margins greater than 25. Owen had a humongous day 3 with 485 points!! (Ruddy does that beat your record? I cant remember, but I think it does). Dan only won 2 days all up, including his huge final day - scoring 390 which put him in front for the first time all week. Neither team used a single acquisition, and both had about the same games played - Dan with 3 more than Owen, but if scores are averaged by games played, he still had more fppg anyway. Both teams had 6 players score tons and one each with a double; however Dan had 4 players between 80 and 100, compared to Owen with just 3 in that range.
Owens best were Dorrell Wright (202 from 4), Blake Griffen (178 from 3), Al Jefferson (150 from 4), Andre Miller (131 from 3), Rajon Rondo (130 from 3) and Chris Kaman (114 from 3); and Best for Dan were Dwayne Wade (235 from 3!!), Al Horford (160 from 4), Tony Allen (143 from 4), Carlos Delfino (122 from 3), Dirk Nowitzki (118 from 3) and Mike Conley (114 from 4).
#5 <a title="Jasmines Mob...
Now back to the footy - Its been a lot of fun over these last few weeks sorting out this team, and we have started alright. UCantBeTooSerious is the name of the team. We scored 2295 in round 1, for a ranking of 7,928th ... not as good as a lot of others here, but not too shabby - especially considering the way in which this team was chosen. And, although we are aiming for best OA finish, I should point out that we won all 5 league games!!
Over the break, I will introduce the members of the team. But first - just a reminder on what this team is all about:
Basically this team has been entirely set up, and will be managed, jointly by the donors of Too Serious.
For those that dont know - after you make a donation to this site, you get some added benefits such as (among others)  the ability to change the number of rows on a page, and the Donor Forum.
In the Donor Forum, we have been busy selecting structures and players for this team, along with the name, emergencies and captain. All trades etc throughout the year will also be chosen by joint decisions. It is not an ideal way to run a team, and therefore we do not know what to expect from it, but it will surely be a lot of fun, and interesting at the very least.
If you want to get involved, but have not donated yet - you can easily do so <a href="http://tooserious.net/donate.php" target="_blank">HERE[/url]!!Â
Now, without further ado....
<!--more-->
Our round 1 team: (name, round score, watchlist votes*)
* Any donors that wished too, submitted a watchlist of the players they thought should be in the team. There were 22 watchlists created, and I have included the votes each player received here. We then had discussions about any changes that were neccesary and made some final decisions by voting in polls.
Defenders:
Gibbs (vc), 138 (VC up to 276), 21; Goddard, 119, 22; Lower, 110, 9; Broughton, 98, 15; Grimes, 83, 15;...
Over the break, I will introduce the members of the team. But first - just a reminder on what this team is all about:
Basically this team has been entirely set up, and will be managed, jointly by the donors of Too Serious.
For those that dont know - after you make a donation to this site, you get some added benefits such as (among others)  the ability to change the number of rows on a page, and the Donor Forum.
In the Donor Forum, we have been busy selecting structures and players for this team, along with the name, emergencies and captain. All trades etc throughout the year will also be chosen by joint decisions. It is not an ideal way to run a team, and therefore we do not know what to expect from it, but it will surely be a lot of fun, and interesting at the very least.
If you want to get involved, but have not donated yet - you can easily do so <a href="http://tooserious.net/donate.php" target="_blank">HERE[/url]!!Â
Now, without further ado....
<!--more-->
Our round 1 team: (name, round score, watchlist votes*)
* Any donors that wished too, submitted a watchlist of the players they thought should be in the team. There were 22 watchlists created, and I have included the votes each player received here. We then had discussions about any changes that were neccesary and made some final decisions by voting in polls.
Defenders:
Gibbs (vc), 138 (VC up to 276), 21; Goddard, 119, 22; Lower, 110, 9; Broughton, 98, 15; Grimes, 83, 15;...
Hi all
This is a simple new post called "Beat the Best".
Its premise is simple. Â Lets see how we would go about finding the chinks in the armour of the leading Supercoach team/s, and how we can use our points of differences (PODS) to advantage.
This week, congratulations to The Tentacle, a Hawk fan, though it must be said, he does have some love for their mortal enemies, the Bombers.
2619. Â This dude has already put a margin of 319 over me, and Im sure has gapped most of the rest of us by a fair margin. Â So what can we do to catch up?
Was it just a Kardashian week from him? Â Find out over the break.<!--more-->Know this - we will be hunting the best team (and maybe having a good old yak about the best team structure) each week, so if you are the best team, get here to work out what your opponents are thinking. Â If youre not, come here and get some tips on what makes the leading team, then tweak for your own satisfaction.
This one, well after Round 1 its all a bit random, though weve already in the previous thread had a good chat on whether its all over for those under 2300 points in the first week. Â Though Id love to fill everyone with confidence that they can make a comeback, a good start is crucial in Supercoach, and I dont want to hoodwink anyone. Â To come back from a score of somewhere in the 2000 region in Round 1, thats a bridge too far.
So, back to the Tentacles team in order of points scored this week:
DEF: Newman, Goddard, Shaw, Deledio, Heppell, Grimes, Hurley (Duigan, Stanley, Toy)
MID: Swan, Watson, A Swallow, Pendlebury, Curnow, Krakouer (D Swallow, Harris, Hibberd)
RUC: Cox, Hille (Derickx, McCauley)
FWD: J Riewoldt, Tapscott, McKernan, Jetta (just for you Jo), Green, N Riewoldt, Richardson (Gumbleton, Prestia, Matera)
Defence - My thoughts is firstly we see a heavily loaded backline. Â This is an interesting strategy, but as we think here at TS, you probably need a few cows coming from defence, so its...
This is a simple new post called "Beat the Best".
Its premise is simple. Â Lets see how we would go about finding the chinks in the armour of the leading Supercoach team/s, and how we can use our points of differences (PODS) to advantage.
This week, congratulations to The Tentacle, a Hawk fan, though it must be said, he does have some love for their mortal enemies, the Bombers.
2619. Â This dude has already put a margin of 319 over me, and Im sure has gapped most of the rest of us by a fair margin. Â So what can we do to catch up?
Was it just a Kardashian week from him? Â Find out over the break.<!--more-->Know this - we will be hunting the best team (and maybe having a good old yak about the best team structure) each week, so if you are the best team, get here to work out what your opponents are thinking. Â If youre not, come here and get some tips on what makes the leading team, then tweak for your own satisfaction.
This one, well after Round 1 its all a bit random, though weve already in the previous thread had a good chat on whether its all over for those under 2300 points in the first week. Â Though Id love to fill everyone with confidence that they can make a comeback, a good start is crucial in Supercoach, and I dont want to hoodwink anyone. Â To come back from a score of somewhere in the 2000 region in Round 1, thats a bridge too far.
So, back to the Tentacles team in order of points scored this week:
DEF: Newman, Goddard, Shaw, Deledio, Heppell, Grimes, Hurley (Duigan, Stanley, Toy)
MID: Swan, Watson, A Swallow, Pendlebury, Curnow, Krakouer (D Swallow, Harris, Hibberd)
RUC: Cox, Hille (Derickx, McCauley)
FWD: J Riewoldt, Tapscott, McKernan, Jetta (just for you Jo), Green, N Riewoldt, Richardson (Gumbleton, Prestia, Matera)
Defence - My thoughts is firstly we see a heavily loaded backline. Â This is an interesting strategy, but as we think here at TS, you probably need a few cows coming from defence, so its...
Heya all,
So I thought I would post my first topic for the year and now that the lockout is finished and teams are locked in, what better subject to talk about that trading. This article was originally written for the Herald Sun but never made it to press for one reason or another. Some of the content is a bit late now that Round 1 has completed but most of it is relevant. Rather than edit it out, I thought I would give it to you in its original format and all its glory. Please keep in mind that the target audience of this article is not seasoned veterans, but those who are new to SC/DT.
Without further ado...
A wise man once told me the most important rule of SuperCoach and that is ‘trades are like GOLD and should be treated as suchâ€.
There are 4 key principals behind this rule and to this day, I still find it difficult to follow some of them. I will go through them now for you and give some advice on how to maximise your trades, set your trading goal and strategy, and avoid making critical trading errors. Follow me over the break...<!--more-->
The first and most crucial principal of an effective trading strategy is to never trade before the team sheets are released and if possible, wait until the Sunday teams have been released on Friday afternoon. I have been guilty of not following this rule many times in the past and have been burnt by it just as many times because anything can happen during the week, be it injuries on the training track, tweaks to game plan or changes by the selection panel, brain explosions elsewhere in the football world (a certain Collingwood player burnt me big time a few years ago), etc.
I call this problem the ‘itchy trade finger’ syndrome and for me, the only way to avoid it if you suffer from this syndrome is to resist logging into SuperCoach during the week. By all means, do your homework and go on the fantasy forums, check in with the media to get the latest info, decide on who’s out and...
So I thought I would post my first topic for the year and now that the lockout is finished and teams are locked in, what better subject to talk about that trading. This article was originally written for the Herald Sun but never made it to press for one reason or another. Some of the content is a bit late now that Round 1 has completed but most of it is relevant. Rather than edit it out, I thought I would give it to you in its original format and all its glory. Please keep in mind that the target audience of this article is not seasoned veterans, but those who are new to SC/DT.
Without further ado...
A wise man once told me the most important rule of SuperCoach and that is ‘trades are like GOLD and should be treated as suchâ€.
There are 4 key principals behind this rule and to this day, I still find it difficult to follow some of them. I will go through them now for you and give some advice on how to maximise your trades, set your trading goal and strategy, and avoid making critical trading errors. Follow me over the break...<!--more-->
The first and most crucial principal of an effective trading strategy is to never trade before the team sheets are released and if possible, wait until the Sunday teams have been released on Friday afternoon. I have been guilty of not following this rule many times in the past and have been burnt by it just as many times because anything can happen during the week, be it injuries on the training track, tweaks to game plan or changes by the selection panel, brain explosions elsewhere in the football world (a certain Collingwood player burnt me big time a few years ago), etc.
I call this problem the ‘itchy trade finger’ syndrome and for me, the only way to avoid it if you suffer from this syndrome is to resist logging into SuperCoach during the week. By all means, do your homework and go on the fantasy forums, check in with the media to get the latest info, decide on who’s out and...
Well, if nothing really- everyone loves a good brag, so lets break out the squads that weve been working on and show them off to the world.
Have you avoided any of the catastrophes so far? I know Ive been hurt by Selwood (Well, not as hurt as he is, poor guy! 14 mouth stitches! ouch!) - But was lucky to avoid Foley.
Currently sitting on 1667 from 16/23 (yes, Im counting the captain as two players so technically only 15 have played.)
Grimes, Heppell, Atley, Cox, Goodes, Higgins and Richardson to go, so Im hoping a 2300+ isnt out of the question.
Team is over the break.
<!--more-->
<img src="http://tooserious.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/my_team_2011.png" width="480px">
So, how are you going?
Also, dont forget to join in the live chat over in the <a href="http://tooserious.net/live_scores.php">Live scores[/url] section, its been good fun these last few days. Man, its great to have Footy back!
Have you avoided any of the catastrophes so far? I know Ive been hurt by Selwood (Well, not as hurt as he is, poor guy! 14 mouth stitches! ouch!) - But was lucky to avoid Foley.
Currently sitting on 1667 from 16/23 (yes, Im counting the captain as two players so technically only 15 have played.)
Grimes, Heppell, Atley, Cox, Goodes, Higgins and Richardson to go, so Im hoping a 2300+ isnt out of the question.
Team is over the break.
<!--more-->
<img src="http://tooserious.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/my_team_2011.png" width="480px">
So, how are you going?
Also, dont forget to join in the live chat over in the <a href="http://tooserious.net/live_scores.php">Live scores[/url] section, its been good fun these last few days. Man, its great to have Footy back!
Page 230 of 294
XenPorta 2 PRO
© Jason Axelrod from 8WAYRUN.COM