Couldn't bring myself to put Waite in, misses too many games for being a knob

certainly a chance for a similar outcome, some confidence from the fact that he scored well when they got belted round 1

Zac Merrett is simply a star player though, can't see any reason why he would have a significant dip in form at all

double post

needs advice for below, also not sure how you make the options show up?

Option 1 - OUT: Barlow/Rockliff, IN: Kennedy, Gray - 268k in bank - Reliable robby with great VC option tonight and enjoy the game factor. No Less cash, more fun on friday night, more reliable score - no supercoach 'mirage'. Or;

Option 2 - OUT: Barlow/Rockliff, IN: Kennedy, Johannisen - 461 in bank - more cash, risk if johanissen bombs against the hawks and will have to VC loop say ablett, danger perhaps.

I'm sticking with Rockliff and Barlow this week and double trading my mid price selections that haven't lived up to my expectations. Jack Steele and Brad Crouch out, Papley and Parish in. How JJ goes against the hawks will determine whether he gets into my side next week

Zach and Jackson are like chalk and cheese. Jackson is purely an outside player and and is just not in the same class. Zach averaged 88 last year in his second season, playing as a forward who rotated through the middle every now and then. I watched a replay of the Bombers-Demons game yesterday and whenever an umpire threw the ball up, Zach was there. Through necessity, he's part of Essendon's first string clearance set-up.

I've been spooked out of trading Barlow with the withdrawal of mundy.
Don't make me regret it Mr barlow (and you as well Ross)

Thumbs up: Rocky > Merrett, Gresham > Parish
Thumbs Down: Rocky > Danger, Barlow > Parish
Vote 1: Just Rocky > Parker

I'm not saying he's going to maintain the average of 120+, but will end the season with an average of an absolute minimum of 95 and a max of about 105. My guess is 98-100 average for the season if he remains uninjured, but it's only a guess

Also, I don't see how the fact he plays for Essendon is going to hinder his scoring, if you're good enough you score well under any circumstances (ie: shit team, stacked team of guns, pushed to the forwardline/backline for a bit and opposition all won't make sure a player scores terribly if they're guns)

99 tonight (128 DT). 28 touches, 8 tackles, 3 1%ers. Was on 12 at QT due to butchering the footy and Port were 6 goals up so his score was scaled accordingly. On the negative side were his 5 clanger disposals. I think he is the real deal.