End Season Forced Delistments

Discussion in 'ORFFL' started by stkildathunda, Jun 22, 2012.

  1. Jason

    Jason Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    3,810
    Likes Received:
    1,418
    <blockquote>Quote from stkildathunda on June 22, 2012, 09:23
    The way i see it is its not really a "keeper" league as it doesnt reward coaches in selecting quality kids or "diamonds" in rough.</blockquote>

    Bollocks. Total bollocks. You provide no justification for your assertion, which I contend has no basis.

    In ORFFL at the end of season, you can keep a core of 15 players at 25+ years as your main squad and still keep up to 5 speculative 'kids' or 'project players' when it comes time to trim down list size to 20.
     
  2. I also think we should sort all of this out in the steel cage.

    Folding chairs optional
     
  3. tAdmin

    tAdmin Guest

    Foreign objects are illegal.

    Bit racist but.
     
  4. So what if they're Australian made?
     
  5. tAdmin

    tAdmin Guest

    Manufacturing is dead in Australia.
     
  6. anthak

    anthak Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    10,186
    Likes Received:
    5,016
    <blockquote>Quote from Hornsy on June 22, 2012, 12:17
    @Ant

    I wrote that the rule may disadvantage some, not that it is flawed. There's a difference there, and it's not just semantics (rules by their nature advantage some, disadvantage others). If you want to debate this further, feel free to PM me, as this isn't the forum for it.</blockquote>
    I never suggested that you wrote that it was flawed, just that it may be... but im missing the point still.
    fair enough, what you wrote.
    No need for a side discussion on that mate. but thanks anyway.

    sorry to misrepresent you.
     
  7. Lucas

    Lucas Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,973
    Likes Received:
    121
    <blockquote>Quote from Jason on June 22, 2012, 12:49
    <blockquote>Quote from stkildathunda on June 22, 2012, 09:23
    The way i see it is its not really a "keeper" league as it doesnt reward coaches in selecting quality kids or "diamonds" in rough.</blockquote>

    Bollocks. Total bollocks. You provide no justification for your assertion, which I contend has no basis.

    In ORFFL at the end of season, you can keep a core of 15 players at 25+ years as your main squad and still keep up to 5 speculative 'kids' or 'project players' when it comes time to trim down list size to 20.</blockquote>

    This.
     
  8. TerryinBangkok

    TerryinBangkok Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    5,710
    Likes Received:
    2,108
    <blockquote>Quote from Hornsy on June 22, 2012, 12:17

    There's a difference there, and it's not just semantics.</blockquote>

    I knocked, but the door was a jar and no sceptre to be seen about.

    Actually, it is semantics and it is the use of "keeper" that causes misunderstanding. Those that are students of history will no doubt have noted that during the very formative stages of ORFFL, Hornsy was not too nimble with his spelling (a bit like the current PL actually). Clearly what he intended to say was Keplar League.

    Hope that clarifies matters for all concerned getting their nuts in a knot.
     
  9. tAdmin

    tAdmin Guest

    It's a serious medical condition.
     
  10. TerryinBangkok

    TerryinBangkok Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    5,710
    Likes Received:
    2,108
    <blockquote>Quote from Hornsy on June 23, 2012, 12:52
    It's a serious medical condition.</blockquote>

    Fear not laddie. We are here to see that you soon get well again.
    .
    <img src="http://tooserious.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/wr78j-mad-doctor.jpg" />
     
  11. tAdmin

    tAdmin Guest

    Hey that guy kinda looks like a troll.
     
  12. port_leschenault

    port_leschenault Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,714
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    How dare thee TiB, I'm insulated!
     
  13. Just to clarify, the 6 de-listments was the key thing wasn't it, not the getting your team down to 20 players pre-draft.

    Meaning if I went into the draft with 27 players I could then de-list 6 and draft 5?
     
  14. stkildathunda

    stkildathunda Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,555
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought we had to have 20 on our list before the draft?
     
  15. Tino

    Tino Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    11
    Too much conflict for me.
     
  16. Jason

    Jason Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    3,810
    Likes Received:
    1,418
    On this one, I'm with SKT. Need to have list down to 20.
     
  17. bgt2110

    bgt2110 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    437
    Likes Received:
    158
    So in a situation where one team offers up two players for just one player from the other team and it is accepted one team will have 27 players and the other 25. To get the list down to 20 does that mean the team with 27 players has to delist 7 and draft 6 and the team with 25 delist 5 and draft 6 ?

    Or do both teams still have to delist the mandatory 6 and one team draft 5 and the other 7 ?
     
  18. thokash

    thokash Full-Time Magician Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    1,060
    No need to make it complicated, lists must be 20 players before the draft.
     
  19. But going by that kash then thunda's argument of trading your list down would work, instead of de-listing, and I thought that was a big no-no?

    I thought I understood it till I asked about it...
     
  20. thokash

    thokash Full-Time Magician Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    1,060
    I think what I meant to say was minimum 6 delistings (can be more) and a maximum of 20 players on a list before the draft. Or at least that's how I understood it.
     

Share This Page