@Moblets - so yeah you're thinking anything less than premium is unacceptable. It's a fair argument. For me it also depends on how many trades I'd...
Mate, it looks pretty good to me - admire your resolve in that you've gone GNR pretty strictly. I wouldn't be doing anything drastic to be honest....
whips, my view on it I think is similar to yours - on the available evidence it seems Broughton is going to average less than premium but perhaps...
I'm not sure if Lake's output will be affected too much by the potential returns of Williams and Morris. Throughout his years as a premium, Lake...
<blockquote>Quote from carly on April 3, 2012, 22:19 <blockquote>Quote from Morgs on April 3, 2012, 21:29 What did you score...
There's no way it would be worth the risk to compromise your bench selections at all for, as has been pointed out, around 20 points - or to be...
Just joined Fully Serious - 15/18 spots filled now.
@BlueBeliever - Good get re Cox 2011 but in fairness he did benefit from a scoring change for rucks and probably also a rule change (sub rule).
That eases the fears about Stevens' job security slightly I guess. They might be semi resting him as I think he's played virtually full games so...
Woosha says it here - think that's what he must mean: http://www.westcoasteagles.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/7155/newsid/130696/default.aspx
Ah right, well I didn't have the app R1 last year so that could explain it. Hmm maybe the toys didn't have to come out of the cot then.
I think last year it was after Round 1. I don't see why it can't be after full lockout but I remember being irritated about it last year so I...
@Banzai - that summary is gold. I've been turning my head upside down thinking it through in other ways but the way you've described it makes a...
I'm not so sure if the amount of love for Heater here is justified. Don't get me wrong, I think he looks like a pretty good pick and there aren't...
Great discussion. These players do seem to have significant reward to go with the risk. My question, however, is whether this mainly relevant to...
@Yamum - yeah it's a good point about forwards/defenders having a greater standard deviation so I might have to think about getting a few more mid...
I think two different things are being mixed up here. There's the GNR v GMR distinction and there's the distinction between GNR with 3-4 mid...
Was that one mid-pricer each or one between the three of them..? And who was the player? Fyfe?
Yamum, what was your reasoning behind saying that you need 3-4 mid premiums to score big from the start? Obviously I agree they are the highest...
I'm thinking 3-0-3 at the moment (the Breaker Morant) but it'll be interesting to see Barlow's form and role. Re Pendlebury: I'm not really up...
Separate names with a comma.