mandatory is a moot point anyway isnt it? even though theres only 15 votes been cast, surely the remaining three wouldnt be silly enough to vote...
I guess im not as nice as you two blokes, because I say if you get an injury and havent drafted a squad with enough depth then its your own fault....
YAD69 wrote: Tomster, I reckon that the home team does the scoring for the game and also does a summary of the game and then you can collate for...
my fav thus far +1
good bump - i fail to see how there are allegedly 16 committed coaches yet not 16 votes on each and every rule proposal!?!?
whats with all the pink man? lol.
[img]
Ill post a couple ive been playing with when bored below. I assume this will probably end in a vote like all other things so maybe someone...
may i respectfully suggest something a little more..... refined? have included one such example [img]
Welcome Fresh and choppers aka Banchang Barcrawlers
Just putting it out there> If we cant find anyone keen, let alone bona fide committed coaches, why dont we just close the books on the 14...
its great that we're getting closer to hashing out some of these details. enjoying the democracy
HOLKY wrote: 3 c), 4 a), 5 b), 6 a) 7 b) (We get plenty of replacements). I'll need a translator for 8, 9 b) (IC are already wildcard), 10 c),...
1. d) No leaders 2. a) 23 3. c) delist if you want 4. a) 15 5. a) no 6. a) yes 7. b) absolutely not 8. im in between b and c 9. a)...
yep im with you as far as injuries or players whose roles have changed or a diamond in the rough or whatever, but making it mandatory seems a bit...
why do you suggest having mandatory delists? cant see the reasoning behind it
Tylo ill pm you for clarification champ. i have zero desire of hijacking this thread and starting some flame-war. lets concentrate on sorting...
Bearfly wrote: Hey Popey, I have 2 UF Keeper Leagues that have been going for the past 2 seasons - it looks like one or two coaches from each...
Separate names with a comma.