I am good with the structural aspects of 3 4 & 5 as indicated initially ant, but I was not a fan of the pick your own opponent idea, I don't get...
Hey Jen, SC are now calling him Maister too :)
I somehow missed CR's post until Terry C&P it. Not sure I am 100% behind point 5. Sure, we and the ORFFL have to step together where limited...
Grizzles wrote: Jones was the higher scorer over the nab but I think Mitchell has better js at least until he gets downgraded again when the lti...
When you need the big news, you go to the Gold Coast bulletin, clearly; DANNY Stanley is in doubt for round 1 of the AFL season after the Suns...
I have 4, but one is my breakout back hope, I have Hartlett, Wines, Stevenson & Pittard.
10 non players is at least 5 too many mate, itwon'thappen after R13, by hook or by crook
I missed something obviously, why wasn't he named?
ty chels, a gentleman and a scholar, that was one seriously long day.. :)
Sticking this here as I am still not yet home and can't find the blog thread Misfits R! <table border='0' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0'...
Tippet is a lazy sack of ****, make him run laps :)
lol, apt and correct, though no alcohol, just an over supplyof fools..
It is stupid Chris, hope they change it next year, makes the whole thing disjointed and rubbery, look forward to the reviews..
The relevant discussion is here: http://tooserious.net/forum/Forum/tabid/91/forumid/15/threadid/37112/scope/posts/threadpage/2/Default.aspx...
I am in favour of free agency. I would love every player to only ever play for one club, it would make the $400 bucks I spent getting a $200...
He is pretty consistent but I think he is possibly more likely to maintain his rank than surge above it, ignore the NAB R1 score they...
At this point I should admit right up until 5 minutes ago Ithoughtthis was game week 6, not 5, back tothedrawing board re trades :)
JC wrote: anthak wrote: Lenh191 wrote: I swear that's not the line I read first time around, long day I guess...... Ant is correct, and so...
My understanding of the application is that is incorrect, that the topic was discussed and ruled on, that it was seen as double dipping....
Separate names with a comma.