It's not high quality players that will be dropped. It's the dregs. Who's making a team where players 25-28 are better than what they can get in...
Yeah. I haven't got the numbers. But I feel like even a 2nd round pick on average does better than player 27 on a team.
If only the AFL could add 4 more games to Opening Round :cool:
Option 3 seems like the best. Even though 3 of my top 7 are Collingwood. It just means that we get round 1, 3 rounds of speedbumps, regular season.
Jamie Elliott is doubled up
Agreed. I rebuilt my side to playable just by being more practical. And I had to rebuild my midfield depth this draft.
Pick 52 (Bulls had 51) Charlie Banfield @Mick
As someone who was a couple of years ago having to worry about filling a field, this isn't the way. I fixed my team by drafting depth. This will...
Hmm. But therein lies the skill. The decision of who to hold onto, in exchange for not taking a pick, and who to drop so you can take a pick.
Not much of one. A lot of the MSD nowadays is picking top up players and players who proved themselves in rounds 1-12 or whenever it is now.
People already take long enough when the options are "take a pick" and "trade". And yes, it's possible that a player gets picked then injuries...
@wrightbrendan
Pick 39: Sam Clohesy Pick 40: Cam Nairn
Pick 16: Ryan Angwin @insider
Can we get a summary of trades? I was talking about trades and someone made an offer for a pick I traded.
Eden trade PSD 8 to Staghorn Flat for Ned Long.
Pick 4: Peter Ladhams @Batfink
The Banfield bounce? :p
Confirmed. I can use the picks more.
I get that, but did they have to make GWS get both 2 team byes?
Separate names with a comma.