another big score by Buzz this week! Almost up in the top 1000 overall now :)
Round 16 (AFL round 19);31/7 - 3/8.Chelsea Roffey Appreciation Round. Waikikamoocow can once again host Chelsea as they will host Whitsunday in...
I'm ranked about 18,000th, and dropping quick lately. Looks like ill end with my worst ranking in years, prob since about 2009 or so; however last...
Also, I notice Foul Bay now have the greatest Points Against. They've had a target on them again this year, and looks as tho teams are bringing...
Welcome back Grav :) I wish Gariwerd had a waterboy like yours. Yad stepped up pretty well mate. Shame he couldn't get a full side up for our game...
ChiefRussell wrote: ChiefRussell wrote: ChiefRussell wrote: No loopholing for the Chooks in this split round I think, all my non-playing...
anthak wrote: anthak wrote: anthak wrote: Gariwerd Cockatoos ]D: BSmith, Guthrie, TBA, TBA (e: Tuohy) ]M: Polec, Christensen, KStevens...
chels wrote: Revised Waikick team, Prap I am posting both the original and the revised, if I have, in your opinion, breached the spirit of ORFFA...
TerryinBangkok wrote: Len wrote: Len wrote: Not a lot to play with this round, worried Kelly might wear a vest and Terlich will miss, hoping...
TerryinBangkok wrote: A simple soul, who likes to keep things simple. Our game is built around SC. In SC you can loophole, split round or no....
Bandit wrote: All very interesting... whilst I named TBA in some spaces, it never dawned on me to use a loop hole in ORFFA, simple because this...
TerryinBangkok wrote: [img] I hadn't seen this before I wrote/posted my last comment. I like it though. Ultimate freedom, ultimate responsibility!
I don't think the timing of the discussion is helpful. I have never had any issue with people not naming their full side before the first lockout....
Len wrote: Len wrote: Quick note guys, I can see I have incoming messages but my message system is overloaded and Les is trying to fix it, so...
Len wrote: anthak wrote: I would be extremely surprised that we would have to vote on that. Should that rule not already be a given? Of course...
Thanks Chris. I just want to let you know that I didn't think anything untoward is happening. At this stage of the round, I can't see any issues...
I would be extremely surprised that we would have to vote on that. Should that rule not already be a given? Of course we should be selecting named...
Len wrote: anthak wrote: Yeah, that is kinda laughable Len. That's not exactly the point tho. The problem was that in round 1, Chris didn't...
Yeah, that is kinda laughable Len. That's not exactly the point tho. The problem was that in round 1, Chris didn't even have any non playing...
Separate names with a comma.