2015 ORFFU Losers Finals

Discussion in 'ORFFU' started by JPK, Aug 18, 2015.

  1. JPK

    JPK Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    4,788
    Likes Received:
    3,318
    Just to make sure everyone is clear with the losers finals: The part of the ladder we care about is: [​IMG] The map for the finals is: [​IMG]
    Good luck to all teams, to show how sh!t they truly can be. Except for maybe Banchang, for obvious reasons.
     
  2. eagle_eyed

    eagle_eyed Training the house down!

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,061
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    Southern Cross team for their last appearance of the season ;) Def: Garland, Taylor, Hurley, Day (oop) Mid: Fyfe, Swallow, Swan, Sheed Ruck: Ryder Fwd: Rioli, Bartel, Stringer, Campbell (e) Hoskin Elliot Int: Cameron, Neal-Bullen (e) Blakely Thanks for a memorable season guys, after starting with 6W & 2L, I managed to win 2 of my last 9. The fitness team will be working overtime this off season so the boys can run out the season,the recruiters will be looking hard to find some personnel that can add to a seemingly fragile list. The club will be doing everything in it's power to create more depth and competition for spots in 2016!
     
  3. choppers

    choppers Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    2,531
    choppers wrote:
    Banchang Barcrawlers team going for the title of The BIGGEST LOSER..........up against Coolgardie Prospectors DEF: Impey Hodge Newnes Docherty (Laidler) MID: Shaw Montagna Selwood Gaff (Gibson) RUC: Pyke FWD: Blair Adams Lambert Walters (Whiley OOP) I/C: Suckling Cunningham (Lemmens) OUT: Gibson Laidler IN: Impey Shaw
    Late change: Whiley (OOP) added to FWD Emergency.
     
  4. JPK

    JPK Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    4,788
    Likes Received:
    3,318
    Unless I'm very-much mistaken, we're still awaiting a team from Gisborne. There's a chance the bus got lost, and headed for 'the garden of' rather than the coastal whaling town.
     
  5. Tomster

    Tomster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,193
    Likes Received:
    651
    JPK wrote:
    Unless I'm very-much mistaken, we're still awaiting a team from Gisborne. There's a chance the bus got lost, and headed for 'the garden of' rather than the coastal whaling town. We made that mistake last time, this time we forced players to walk as a start of pre-season training. It was also punishment for finding them all in the bar for post-season drinks when the year wasn't even finished (admittedly, they were only found there because the coaching staff were drinking their sorrows away on Wednesday night). Lake, Grundy, Hunt, Hombsch Masten, McVeigh, Hill, Neale Maric Riewoldt, Christensen, Lennon, Ambrose Douglas, Hamling Let the games begin! Oh, and good luck to those in the 'other' finals series
     
  6. eagle_eyed

    eagle_eyed Training the house down!

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,061
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    PDogs 3/202/67 - Gropers 2/167/83
     
  7. choppers

    choppers Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    2,531
    Coolgardie 3/219/73 leading Banchang 3/188/62.7
     
  8. eagle_eyed

    eagle_eyed Training the house down!

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,061
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    PDogs 10/729/73 - Sandgropers 8/621/77
     
  9. choppers

    choppers Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    2,531
    I think these scores are correct........ Banchang 12/944 vs Coolgardie 9/677.......
     
  10. DamoH

    DamoH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,189
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    The Smugglers currently leading at 21/30th time against the Vikings 1080/11 (98) to 895/10 (89.5).
     
  11. JPK

    JPK Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    4,788
    Likes Received:
    3,318
    Thanks for the updates Choppers. Nice work from everyone taking initiative to keep score!
     
  12. Tomster

    Tomster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,193
    Likes Received:
    651
    Don't really want to post updates until after the match is over, so as not to take away from the 'other' finals where I believe the focus should be. Will post scores after WCE v WB though
     
  13. eagle_eyed

    eagle_eyed Training the house down!

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,061
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    My calculations have Southern Cross pinching the match 15/1186/79 to Hughenden's 15/1183/79. Three measley points separated the teams in what was satisfying revenge for the Sandgropers after their loss in Veto Cup 1.
     
  14. DamoH

    DamoH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,189
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Full match report to come during the week, but for now the Smugglers have knocked over the Vikings 1477 - 1317.
     
  15. Batfink

    Batfink Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    665
    eagle_eyed wrote:
    My calculations have Southern Cross pinching the match 15/1186/79 to Hughenden's 15/1183/79. Three measley points separated the teams in what was satisfying revenge for the Sandgropers after their loss in Veto Cup 1. Might need a recount here I came up with 1197 to 1197....
     
  16. eagle_eyed

    eagle_eyed Training the house down!

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,061
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    Batfink wrote:
    eagle_eyed wrote:
    My calculations have Southern Cross pinching the match 15/1186/79 to Hughenden's 15/1183/79. Three measley points separated the teams in what was satisfying revenge for the Sandgropers after their loss in Veto Cup 1. Might need a recount here I came up with 1197 to 1197.... Might need an independent party ;) My original post is definitely wrong, looks like some of the Saturday scores changed overnight, however you add it up there wasn't much between the two teams, score check to come.
     
  17. YAD69

    YAD69 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,651
    Likes Received:
    2,052
    eagle_eyed wrote:
    Batfink wrote:
    eagle_eyed wrote:
    My calculations have Southern Cross pinching the match 15/1186/79 to Hughenden's 15/1183/79. Three measley points separated the teams in what was satisfying revenge for the Sandgropers after their loss in Veto Cup 1. Might need a recount here I came up with 1197 to 1197.... Might need an independent party ;) My original post is definitely wrong, looks like some of the Saturday scores changed overnight, however you add it up there wasn't much between the two teams, score check to come. I got Sandgropers with 1,193 to Prairie Dogs 1,197. can someone else confirm, cheers
     
  18. bryzza

    bryzza Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    1,341
    DamoH wrote:
    Full match report to come during the week, but for now the Smugglers have knocked over the Vikings 1477 - 1317. Thanks for the update damo
     
  19. choppers

    choppers Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    2,531
    i was going to wait for JPK to post as he's the home team but seeing as everyone else has is posting their scores, I think the Barcrawlers finished on top of the Prospectors 1243-1161. subject to confirmation.
     
  20. eagle_eyed

    eagle_eyed Training the house down!

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,061
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    YAD69 wrote:
    eagle_eyed wrote:
    Batfink wrote:
    eagle_eyed wrote:
    My calculations have Southern Cross pinching the match 15/1186/79 to Hughenden's 15/1183/79. Three measley points separated the teams in what was satisfying revenge for the Sandgropers after their loss in Veto Cup 1. Might need a recount here I came up with 1197 to 1197.... Might need an independent party ;) My original post is definitely wrong, looks like some of the Saturday scores changed overnight, however you add it up there wasn't much between the two teams, score check to come. I got Sandgropers with 1,193 to Prairie Dogs 1,197. can someone else confirm, cheers I've added all again (and after what appears to be some changes to the Saturday night scores) I get the same as you YAD, thanks for the confirmation. Well done PDogs, good luck in the next round.
     

Share This Page