That's true Holky, but he only played one game for his 90av, so maybe that has something to do with his not being the next selection.
choppers wrote: That's true Holky, but he only played one game for his 90av, so maybe that has something to do with his not being the next selection. Auto picks are based on the previous seasons averages and as such the boss should get Delaney. I don't have the power to mod posts so can one of the important people please do this and throw the crab that is Clint Jones back into the ocean, thanks.
How's this for a guideline for the future - if you are timed out and the next person takes their pick, then you're stuck with the auto-pick, but if you get a pick up before the next in line then you get who you want. Sound fair?
Cmon fresh - patiently waiting!! In sydney for work this week, I'm wasting my night studying when I could be having a pick!!! I'm sure the glass ofred would be betting knowing I've just signed a gun mid!
From my list the highest rank player available is Farren Ray regardless of average. Tomster is next to pick and hopefully he can confirm who is the next default player and let's hope it's not him who gets that player.
It is in fact Cameron Delaney. Despite only playing one game, he averaged 90, therefore making him the next highest averaging player
ddsaints wrote: What's happened with Hawks? Hope he is alright. It's a shame to see him missing out on his picks. Yeah, it's bizarre that he's AWOL as he was one of the more timely coaches in the original draft. I've dropped him a PM (as I'm sure others have) so hopefully he's back online shortly. I appreciate it's not in the rules, but given his long absence and previous stellar attendance what do people think about standing over his picks? That is, he doesn't get Delaney and his pick is held until he returns. Once he's back he gets to pick. Hopefully, he'll be back before the super-draft on Sunday, but if he isn't then the picks become active and he gets the highest averaging players. I know I'd prefer to at least have some picks from the remaining player pool, rather than get a one-gamer from last year. I'm generally a 'rules is rules' type guy, but as we've already allowed some latitude this draft I think it's fair. Of course, maybe I've misread the situation and he just wants the highest averaging players anyway!
DamoH wrote: ddsaints wrote: What's happened with Hawks? Hope he is alright. It's a shame to see him missing out on his picks. Yeah, it's bizarre that he's AWOL as he was one of the more timely coaches in the original draft. I've dropped him a PM (as I'm sure others have) so hopefully he's back online shortly. I appreciate it's not in the rules, but given his long absence and previous stellar attendance what do people think about standing over his picks? That is, he doesn't get Delaney and his pick is held until he returns. Once he's back he gets to pick. Hopefully, he'll be back before the super-draft on Sunday, but if he isn't then the picks become active and he gets the highest averaging players. I know I'd prefer to at least have some picks from the remaining player pool, rather than get a one-gamer from last year. I'm generally a 'rules is rules' type guy, but as we've already allowed some latitude this draft I think it's fair. Of course, maybe I've misread the situation and he just wants the highest averaging players anyway! He just selected Tim O'Brien
DamoH wrote: ddsaints wrote: What's happened with Hawks? Hope he is alright. It's a shame to see him missing out on his picks. Yeah, it's bizarre that he's AWOL as he was one of the more timely coaches in the original draft. I've dropped him a PM (as I'm sure others have) so hopefully he's back online shortly. I appreciate it's not in the rules, but given his long absence and previous stellar attendance what do people think about standing over his picks? That is, he doesn't get Delaney and his pick is held until he returns. Once he's back he gets to pick. Hopefully, he'll be back before the super-draft on Sunday, but if he isn't then the picks become active and he gets the highest averaging players. I know I'd prefer to at least have some picks from the remaining player pool, rather than get a one-gamer from last year. I'm generally a 'rules is rules' type guy, but as we've already allowed some latitude this draft I think it's fair. Of course, maybe I've misread the situation and he just wants the highest averaging players anyway! Good old posting delays! Ignore/delete as appropriate!