TerryinBangkok wrote: Len wrote: Len wrote: Not a lot to play with this round, worried Kelly might wear a vest and Terlich will miss, hoping for a selection miracle to cover both in pt2 if that happens. Even less now with Paparone dropped, still because we hate blanks we have decided to leave him in. In the spirit of blank fellowship, we are naming Nathan Bock on the IC (Who said he wouldn't play again??!!) and Matty Arnot gets to run around in a spiritual sense at least in the mids. Selection committee seriously kicking itself that they couldn't fit in the rest of the non players... The statisticians are currently in a state of chaos debating on whether this game counts for the three strikeouts, and if it does what does it do to their averages... The realists have gone for a beer.. Backs: Weller, Hombsch, Bruce & Day Mids: Williams, Ward, Dunstan, [span style='text-decoration: line-through;]Arnot - Kelly Ruck: Ryder Fwds: Cameron, Tomlinson, [span style='text-decoration: line-through;]Paparone, Smith IC: Stanley, [span style='text-decoration: line-through;]Bock - Terlich I like this idea. I may be crap at cut and paste, but I can innovate
Final Spelunkers squad... welcome back Ben Reid, pinch hitting in the ruck for me this week (was going to be Dan Jackson but Dimma clearly not happy with the effort last week) Def: Mackie (67), Hooker (80), MacKenzie, Hansen (60) (Atley (60)) Mid: Swallow (104), Pearce (70), Jack, Thomas (Savage (136)) Ruck: Ben Reid - OOP (Apeness (0)) Fwd: Petrie (66), LeCras, Gunston, Sam Reid (Ambrose) Int: Grundy, Bontempelli (97) 544/7
Revised Waikick team, Prap I am posting both the original and the revised, if I have, in your opinion, breached the spirit of ORFFA please let me know and I will revise again. If other members of the Association fell I am outside of the spirit please advise. Team posted before part one of the split round: <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]D - McVeigh, Duffield (107), H Taylor (125), Hibberd (44) (Pedersen, 62) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]M - Fyfe (102), Dal Santo (103), B Crouch, Hannebery (Ziebell, 22) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]R - H McIntosh (40) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]F - J Elliott, Podsiadly, M Robinson (70), T Mitchell (M Wright) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]I/C - S Jacobs, I Smith (Crameri, 64) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;] <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]Revised team: <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]D - McVeigh, Duffield, H Taylor, Hibberd (Pedersen) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]M - Fyfe, Dal Santo, B Crouch, [span style='color: #000000; background: #ffffff;]I Smith(Ziebell) - I Smith moves from I/C to this line, Ziebell remains as E <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]R - H McIntosh <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]F - J Elliott, Podsiadly, M Robinson, M Wright - M Wright moves from E to onfield as Titch not selected - maybe should have left unchanged?. <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]I/C - S Jacobs, C Knights (Crameri) - Knights replaces I Smith (see above). Knights is not playing, should this be a xxx, a blank or is selecting a yet to play, non-player an acceptable way to get the E's points? I guess I could move McVeigh to the I/C and 'play' Griffiths in the back line but that seems wrong when Macca has been selected by the Swans. <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;] <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]Sorry about making this so complicated but it seemed like a bit of a case study about what is acceptable and what is not.
TerryinBangkok wrote: Len wrote: Len wrote: Not a lot to play with this round, worried Kelly might wear a vest and Terlich will miss, hoping for a selection miracle to cover both in pt2 if that happens. Even less now with Paparone dropped, still because we hate blanks we have decided to leave him in. In the spirit of blank fellowship, we are naming Nathan Bock on the IC (Who said he wouldn't play again??!!) and Matty Arnot gets to run around in a spiritual sense at least in the mids. Selection committee seriously kicking itself that they couldn't fit in the rest of the non players... The statisticians are currently in a state of chaos debating on whether this game counts for the three strikeouts, and if it does what does it do to their averages... The realists have gone for a beer.. Backs: Weller, Hombsch, Bruce & Day Mids: Williams, Ward, Dunstan, [span style='text-decoration: line-through;]Arnot - Kelly Ruck: Ryder Fwds: Cameron, Tomlinson, [span style='text-decoration: line-through;]Paparone, Smith IC: Stanley, [span style='text-decoration: line-through;]Bock - Terlich I like this idea. Hahaha, so do I! I'm glad you pointed it out TiB, cause I'd not realised it had been posted. Very funny Len
chels wrote: </br> Revised Waikick team, Prap I am posting both the original and the revised, if I have, in your opinion, breached the spirit of ORFFA please let me know and I will revise again. If other members of the Association fell I am outside of the spirit please advise. Team posted before part one of the split round: <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]D - McVeigh, Duffield (107), H Taylor (125), Hibberd (44) (Pedersen, 62) <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]M - Fyfe (102), Dal Santo (103), B Crouch, Hannebery (Ziebell, 22) <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]R - H McIntosh (40) <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]F - J Elliott, Podsiadly, M Robinson (70), T Mitchell (M Wright) <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]I/C - S Jacobs, I Smith (Crameri, 64) <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;] <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]Revised team: <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]D - McVeigh, Duffield, H Taylor, Hibberd (Pedersen) <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]M - Fyfe, Dal Santo, B Crouch, [span style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0);]I Smith(Ziebell) - I Smith moves from I/C to this line, Ziebell remains as E <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]R - H McIntosh <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]F - J Elliott, Podsiadly, M Robinson, M Wright - M Wright moves from E to onfield as Titch not selected - maybe should have left unchanged?. <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]I/C - S Jacobs, C Knights (Crameri) - Knights replaces I Smith (see above). Knights is not playing, should this be a xxx, a blank or is selecting a yet to play, non-player an acceptable way to get the E's points? I guess I could move McVeigh to the I/C and 'play' Griffiths in the back line but that seems wrong when Macca has been selected by the Swans. <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;] <p style='background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 10px;]Sorry about making this so complicated but it seemed like a bit of a case study about what is acceptable and what is not. <p ></br> <p ></br> You make me smile lad........you're all good Sir Chels
chels wrote: Revised Waikick team, Prap I am posting both the original and the revised, if I have, in your opinion, breached the spirit of ORFFA please let me know and I will revise again. If other members of the Association fell I am outside of the spirit please advise. Team posted before part one of the split round: <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]D - McVeigh, Duffield (107), H Taylor (125), Hibberd (44) (Pedersen, 62) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]M - Fyfe (102), Dal Santo (103), B Crouch, Hannebery (Ziebell, 22) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]R - H McIntosh (40) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]F - J Elliott, Podsiadly, M Robinson (70), T Mitchell (M Wright) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]I/C - S Jacobs, I Smith (Crameri, 64) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;] <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]Revised team: <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]D - McVeigh, Duffield, H Taylor, Hibberd (Pedersen) <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]M - Fyfe, Dal Santo, B Crouch, [span style='background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff; color: #000000;]I Smith(Ziebell) - I Smith moves from I/C to this line, Ziebell remains as E <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]R - H McIntosh <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]F - J Elliott, Podsiadly, M Robinson, M Wright - M Wright moves from E to onfield as Titch not selected - maybe should have left unchanged?. <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]I/C - S Jacobs, C Knights (Crameri) - Knights replaces I Smith (see above). Knights is not playing, should this be a xxx, a blank or is selecting a yet to play, non-player an acceptable way to get the E's points? I guess I could move McVeigh to the I/C and 'play' Griffiths in the back line but that seems wrong when Macca has been selected by the Swans. <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;] <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]Sorry about making this so complicated but it seemed like a bit of a case study about what is acceptable and what is not. Totally fine, I believe.
Complete team for Lilacs <table cellspacing='10] <td rowspan='2]Def: [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDef1_8]Jack Grimes [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDefScore1_8]0 [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDef2_8]Jed Adcock [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDefScore2_8]0 <td class='Emergency][span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDefB1_8]Adam Kennedy [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDefScoreB1_8]0 [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDef3_8]Jake CARLISLE [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDefScore3_8]0 [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDef4_8]Dane Rampe [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDefScore4_8]0 <td class='Emergency][span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDefB2_8] [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HDefScoreB2_8]0 <td rowspan='2]Mid: [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMid1_8]Craig Bird [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMidScore1_8]0 [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMid2_8]Matt White [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMidScore2_8]0 <td class='Emergency][span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMidB1_8]Josh Saunders [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMidScoreB1_8]0 [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMid3_8]Shane Edwards [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMidScore3_8]0 [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMid4_8]Mitch DUNCAN [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMidScore4_8]0 <td class='Emergency][span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMidB2_8] [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HMidScoreB2_8]0 <td rowspan='2]Ruc: [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HRuc1_8]Mike Pyke [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HRucScore1_8]0 <td class='Emergency][span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HRucB1_8] [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HRucScoreB1_8]0 <td rowspan='2]Fwd: [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwd1_8]Jason Winderlich [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwdScore1_8]0 [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwd2_8]Matt Rosa [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwdScore2_8]0 <td class='Emergency][span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwdB1_8]Jack Billings [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwdScoreB1_8]0 [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwd3_8]Paul Chapman [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwdScore3_8]0 [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwd4_8]Josh CADDY [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwdScore4_8]0 <td class='Emergency][span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwdB2_8] [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HFwdScoreB2_8]0 <td rowspan='2]Int: [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HInt1_8]Dane Swan [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HIntScore1_8]0 [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HInt2_8]Scott Thompson [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HIntScore2_8]0 <td class='Emergency][span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HIntB1_8]Josh Hunt [span id='dnn_ctr718_View_rptFixture_HIntScoreB1_8]0
anthak wrote: anthak wrote: anthak wrote: Gariwerd Cockatoos ]D: BSmith, Guthrie, TBA, TBA (e: Tuohy) ]M: Polec, Christensen, KStevens (C), TBA ]R: TBA ]F: RGray, TWalker, Casboult, TBA (eeBoer) ]I: TBA, TBA (e: Wallis) <div> Forgot Tommy Curren! New team <div>D: Guthrie, TBA, TBA,TBA (e: Tuohy) <div>M: Polec, Christensen, KStevens (C), TBA <div>R: TBA <div>F: RGray, Casboult, TBA,TBA (eeBoer) <div>I: ]Wallis, TBA (e: TCurren) New team <div>D: Guthrie, TBA, TBA,TBA (e: Tuohy) <div>M: Polec, KStevens (C), TBA, TBA <div>R: TBA <div>F: RGray, Casboult, TBA,TBA (eeBoer) <div>I: Wallis, TBA (e: TCurren) Updated team: <div>D: Guthrie, Hurn (VC), BSmith, LRussell (e: Tuohy) <div>M: Polec, KStevens (C), Masten, Hutchings <div>R: MCrouch (e: Cunningham) <div>F: RGray, Casboult, KTippett, TWalker (eeBoer) I: Wallis, Deledio (e: TCurren) <p > </br>
'If other members of the Association fell (sic) I am outside of the spirit please advise.' Dunno. Could just mean you have run out of wine chels or I need to call Ghostbusters. While I am here, would just like to add Kyle Martin as EMG on the I/C bench. For some reason it was left as a BLANK and tsLeagues won't let me fill it.
Prap wrote: PACK ATTACK B: Dempster (R Stanley) M: Greenwood, Scully, Greene R: F: L Henderson (Smedts) I/C: Might be dropping below 1000 for first time this season due to injury/omissions B: Dempster, Chaplin, Marley Williams, Cutler (R Stanley) M: Greenwood, Scully, Greene, C Beams R: A Woodward F: L Henderson, S May, T Lynch GCS, D Gorringe (Smedts) I/C: A Miles, J Aish
chels wrote: Revised Waikick team, Prap I am posting both the original and the revised, if I have, in your opinion, breached the spirit of ORFFA please let me know and I will revise again. If other members of the Association fell I am outside of the spirit please advise. <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]Sorry about making this so complicated but it seemed like a bit of a case study about what is acceptable and what is not. The Spirit of the ORFFA is to have fun... I don't mind what anyone does unless it's heartless and outrageous cheating, of which I am willing to believe that none of the current members are capable of. Peace
Prap wrote: chels wrote: Revised Waikick team, Prap I am posting both the original and the revised, if I have, in your opinion, breached the spirit of ORFFA please let me know and I will revise again. If other members of the Association fell I am outside of the spirit please advise. <p style='color: #000000; margin-bottom: 10px; background: #ffffff;]Sorry about making this so complicated but it seemed like a bit of a case study about what is acceptable and what is not. The Spirit of the ORFFA is to have fun... I don't mind what anyone does unless it's heartless and outrageous cheating, of which I am willing to believe that none of the current members are capable of. Peace +1
ChiefRussell wrote: ChiefRussell wrote: ChiefRussell wrote: No loopholing for the Chooks in this split round I think, all my non-playing players are in teams that are playing this week. Big game against the Big Knob. Winner more than likely finishes on top. Both teams scored 1470+ last week. Here is the team as it stands at the moment for the underdogs... Foul Bay: Def: Bartel, M.Johnson, Jaensch, Harwood (Emg. Broughton) Mid: J.Selwood, Liberatore, James Kelly, Judd (Emg. McLean) Ruck: Mumford Fwd: Pavlich, Dahlhaus, Hawkins, Dangerfield (Emg. Yarran) I/C: Stokes, Ja. Roughead (Emg. Vince) Had a bit of a re-think, got a feeling Stokes might be the sub, so have swapped him and Bernie around. Foul Bay: Def:Bartel, M.Johnson, Jaensch, Harwood (Emg. Broughton) Mid:J.Selwood, Liberatore, James Kelly, Judd (Emg. McLean) Ruck:Mumford Fwd:Pavlich, Dahlhaus, Hawkins, Dangerfield (Emg. Yarran) I/C:Vince, Ja. Roughead (Emg. Stokes) Take 3 on the team front, given this week's teams....(mind you, pretty pointless exercise, akin to shuffling the old deck chairs on the Titanic) Roughead out, Rhyce Shaw in... Foul Bay: Def:Bartel, M.Johnson, Jaensch, Harwood (Emg. Broughton) Mid:J.Selwood, Liberatore, James Kelly, Judd (Emg. McLean) Ruck:Mumford Fwd:Pavlich, Dahlhaus, Hawkins, Dangerfield (Emg. Yarran) I/C:Vince, R.Shaw (Emg. Stokes) Watch Roughy score 120+ At least I can console myself with the fact that it won't change the result. Too good Jim! 120, correct weight
Greetings ORFFAns, I hope you are all well. I have emerged from my 5 week Red Centre sabbatical and have officially snapped back to reality (or fantasy, as it were). Many thanks to YAD the Blonde Mullet for keeping the ship afloat while I have been AWOL. Ironically, it seems the boys have fared better in my absence... re: discussion on loop holing and fielding blanks - good to see open and frank discussion on this and from what I can interpret, no one manipulating for unfair advantage. That said, it would be good to put this to bed at seasons end. FWIW - I agree that the issue that needs voting on is that of loop holing, and I for one would be happy to see this practice removed from our league. On a side note, I am happy to offer my post-round review services as of next weekend if Chris or other contributors need a spell.
Good to have you back grav, handy assistant coach you have there. For me this split round has been a drag. Why not simply schedule a weekend without footy? Everyone gets a break including spectators. All teams go into the last few games with very similar days between games. Seems bloody obvious - which I guess is why the whizz kids at afl house have not thought of it.
Welcome back Grav. Winter in the red heart always a nice experience. Somewhere I am playing you this weekend (which for you would have some bearing on finals position) and was hoping your absence might be some sort of advantage, but clearly not to be.
anthak wrote: ChiefRussell wrote: Roughead out, Rhyce Shaw in... Foul Bay: Def:Bartel, M.Johnson, Jaensch, Harwood (Emg. Broughton) Mid:J.Selwood, Liberatore, James Kelly, Judd (Emg. McLean) Ruck:Mumford Fwd:Pavlich, Dahlhaus, Hawkins, Dangerfield (Emg. Yarran) I/C:Vince, R.Shaw (Emg. Stokes) Watch Roughy score 120+ At least I can console myself with the fact that it won't change the result. Too good Jim! 120, correct weight Yep, was spot on about most things this week. People doubted my underdog status but that was well and truly justified. A 1600+ record score without Ablett for the Knob. Deserved premiership favourites, unlucky to not win last year (had one week of bad luck). Their bad luck this year is not having Ablett, but to be honest it is not as big a loss as some would assume. He is just cream on an already very good cake. The midfield depth that has been assembled is formidable. 5 x 100+ mids without Ablett and 2 x 100+ ruckmen means that the drop off from no Ablett is very minimal. Lets hope I don't have to play you until the GF Jim....although I don't like my record against the Blimps and the Cows either of recent times (this is not to discount the other fancies).