Iron Knob 1289 v Powlett 1232 5. Robbie Gray 122 IK 4. Jeff Garlett 121 PP 3. [span style='background: #ffffff;]Mundy 119 PP 2 [span style='background: #ffffff;]Ablett 119 IK 1. Taylor Hunt 117 PP Not sure how we split Ablett/Mundy in rd 1
graeme wrote: Chris, hold hard. I am not seeing correct round 1 scores and we might create a problem. For the record, Gariwerd's scores are correct.
Prap wrote: Iron Knob 1289 v Powlett 1232 5. Robbie Gray 122 IK 4. Jeff Garlett 121 PP 3. [span style='background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]Mundy 119 PP 2 [span style='background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff;]Ablett 119 IK 1. Taylor Hunt 117 PP Not sure how we split Ablett/Mundy in rd 1 I would have thought Ablett gets the 3 and Mundy the 2 since Ablett was on the winning team. That's just my view, not sure of the rules in this scenario.
anthak wrote: graeme wrote: Chris, hold hard. I am not seeing correct round 1 scores and we might create a problem. For the record, Gariwerd's scores are correct. Pretty sure mine are too, I had 1188 not 1200 but I think that's me grabbing the numbers too early as usual.. One thing that would affect scores, and I did post a warning, is if people made changes for round 2 before round one had rolled.
The Nuffers never really expected to beat the FB chooks but we didn't expect to be pecked to within an inch of our lives. I thought hens teeth are rare but this lot savaged both Daisy and Myers within the first five minutes for a combined total of 5 SC points. Of course it didn't help that Stanton decided he didn't want to get his hair wet in Sydney. On a good note we did have a playing ruckman (Nic Nat) for the first time since last June. Hi Ho, Hi Ho, it's off to rehab we go.....
Lenny120 wrote: Prap wrote: Iron Knob 1289 v Powlett 1232 5. Robbie Gray 122 IK 4. Jeff Garlett 121 PP 3. [span style='background-image: none; background-attachment: scroll; background-color: #ffffff; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat repeat;]Mundy 119 PP 2 [span style='background-image: none; background-attachment: scroll; background-color: #ffffff; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat repeat;]Ablett 119 IK 1. Taylor Hunt 117 PP Not sure how we split Ablett/Mundy in rd 1 I would have thought Ablett gets the 3 and Mundy the 2 since Ablett was on the winning team. That's just my view, not sure of the rules in this scenario. I think that's how Fitzy did it last year. Which we should continue with i reckon
Len wrote: anthak wrote: graeme wrote: Chris, hold hard. I am not seeing correct round 1 scores and we might create a problem. For the record, Gariwerd's scores are correct. Pretty sure mine are too, I had 1188 not 1200 but I think that's me grabbing the numbers too early as usual.. One thing that would affect scores, and I did post a warning, is if people made changes for round 2 before round one had rolled. I had you at 1200 all along Len, as we get older I think some more transformation errors creep in.
Have we been given the all clear for Rd 1 and can no change teams in tsl ? By the way - the Hops are only one game out of first place !!
Simonoz wrote: Have we been given the all clear for Rd 1 and can no change teams in tsl ? By the way - the Hops are only one game out of first place !! All good, scores are fine, and the teams have rolled, simplest way to check and be safe now that last weeks team stays is to look at the ladder, if it shows the last round completed than we are good to tinker..
Charlie's Opening 1128 defeated Whitsunday Warriors 1011 5 Sloane (WW) 145 4 Wines (WW) 130 3 The Bont (COS) 126 2 Hooker (COS) 106 1 Johannisen (WW) 103