grav wrote: I'll bid Reece Conca for pick 4. More around the 80 mark (than 85) but potential is there for sure. And I was about to send a PM through asking after young Reece .... ha ha ha! Though in looking at this, the price might've been a little steep for me.
grav wrote: I'll bid Reece Conca for pick 4. More around the 80 mark (than 85) but potential is there for sure. Thanks, but doesn't quite hit the mark. As a comparison, Pick 2 basically went for Goldstein. So my reserve is fairly high, I won't trade unless I get something back I really like.
Prap wrote: grav wrote: I'll bid Reece Conca for pick 4. More around the 80 mark (than 85) but potential is there for sure. Thanks, but doesn't quite hit the mark. As a comparison, Pick 2 basically went for Goldstein. So my reserve is fairly high, I won't trade unless I get something back I really like. Fair enough Prap, I'll bail out too then.
Len wrote: JC wrote: ChiefRussell wrote: Given that I was flooded with offers for Michael Johnson I will take him off the market. Here is a wierd one... I am putting two of the following three players up in a package deal. The players are Greg Broughton (DEF, avg 76), Brock McLean (MID, avg 74) and Leigh Adams (FWD, avg 62). Adams probably the best value of the three due to his FWD status and the fact that his average is largely sub affected (he averaged 79 in 2013). I will even be visible about the reserve. A second round pick will see the deal done. Peripheral stuff and a lower pick will not. The better the draft pick, you win. The auction will last until Monday. Good value I think for someone who is looking for depth in their squad. Chief - I'll bid pick 39 for Broughton and Adams. I realise it's not a 2nd round pick, but it's not far off. Which Monday CR? tbh I thought you meant yesterday Sorry everyone, I did mean Monday just gone. Unfortunately I didn't plan my life out properly and was away on holiday away from internet for the last 3 days. Just got back. While it didn't quite get me the second round pick that I desired, I will accept JC's offer of pick 39 because as he rightly points out, it's nearly a second round pick. I will place the transaction in the appropriate thread. Congrats, JC, you have got two players that have been proven 85+ scorers in the past who are both enough under 30 that you will be able to keep them on your list should you choose to for quite a while to come.
RL is a serious problem and has no place in the FA imo 3 days to go guys before the shutters come down on this trade period.
ChiefRussell wrote: Sorry everyone, I did mean Monday just gone. Unfortunately I didn't plan my life out properly and was away on holiday away from internet for the last 3 days. Just got back. While it didn't quite get me the second round pick that I desired, I will accept JC's offer of pick 39 because as he rightly points out, it's nearly a second round pick. I will place the transaction in the appropriate thread. Congrats, JC, you have got two players that have been proven 85+ scorers in the past who are both enough under 30 that you will be able to keep them on your list should you choose to for quite a while to come. Thanks Chief. Happy to have them both. Certainly not expecting 85 from them, but they're better depth than a few of mine and anything beyond that is a bonus really. Plus, it's not much of a gamble for the price.
[span style='font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 13px;]'[span style='color: #000000; background: #ffffff;]RL is a serious problem and has no place in the FA' [span style='color: #000000; font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 13px; background: #ffffff;] [span style='color: #000000; font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 13px; background: #ffffff;]Len could you translate please?
chels wrote: [span style='font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 13px;]'[span style='background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff; color: #000000;]RL is a serious problem and has no place in the FA' [span style='background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff; font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 13px; color: #000000;] [span style='background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #ffffff; font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 13px; color: #000000;]Len could you translate please? Indeed Real Life is a serious problem, and it has no place in the Outer Regional Fantasy Football Association
ah reality v fantasy. Got it, I think. well, I get the reality that ORFFA fantasy is more important that SC reality.
chels wrote: ah reality v fantasy. Got it, I think. well, I get the reality that ORFFA fantasy is more important that SC reality. AND, if we all chipped in a quiet $2,777.78 each our reality would be better than their fantasy