RMT please!

Discussion in 'RMT' started by julz1986, Mar 23, 2012.

  1. julz1986

    julz1986 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here we go, feel free to not hold back, not overly happy with the Mid too be honest but going against the rookie ruck starting took away my of my cash, just see Maric being able to punch out solid 80-100 at the tigers with his bigger body, they've had rubbish ruckmen for a while now.

    Gone heavy on the DPP(they're underlined) as i always like too, for cover.
    Bank: $43,400


    Back
    Goddard, Deledio, Broughton, Ellis, Lake, Dempsey, Clarke
    Bugg - Smedts

    Mid
    Ablett, Selwood, Dangerfield, Hayes, McDonald, Magner
    Pfeffier - Docherty

    Ruck
    Mcintosh, Maric
    Miles - Stephenson

    Fwd

    Franklin, Pavlich, Chapman, Martin, N.Riewoldt, Porplyzia, D.Smith
    Tomlinson - Kerridge
     
  2. LiQuiD_SiXx

    LiQuiD_SiXx Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    378
    Likes Received:
    48
  3. JackosDream

    JackosDream Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not sure I'm keen on Dempsey because he's coming off a knee reconstruction and the clubs always say the players are better with a year under their belt. Marty Clarke has dubious job security and he's trying to break into a strong side. I think the mids are risky with Dangerfield who promises so much every year but his Supercoach points don't reflect his true worth to the team. Lenny Hayes is in the same boat as Dempsey so I think he makes a very risky 4th mid premium. In the forwards, I can see that you could have a flying start if they fire, but you are losing the ability to make a bit of money to upgrade to premiums and the Porpoise isn't a premium. Hope this helps (and makes sense).
     
  4. Jason

    Jason Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    3,810
    Likes Received:
    1,418
    This isn't the year to focus on DPP. With the removal of the weekly bye merry-go-round from consideration, it isn't anywhere near as critical. Suggest you aim to trade into creating links when you bring in new players mid-season.
     
  5. TerryinBangkok

    TerryinBangkok Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    5,710
    Likes Received:
    2,108
    @julz,

    It really does pay dividends to read all the RMT threads carefully. If you did that you would know that Lake/Dempsey/Clarke is simply asking for trouble and that you have a Seaworld side. You would also know that MPP, even if you love it, is not essential this year until we get to the byes, whereupon you trade into it. It would also be apparent that Billie is old news (at least for me he is).

    Docherty will be a good downgrade option later in life. McDonald/Pfuffer, your money, your risk. Hayes high risk when there are better alternatives. Dangermouse cannot be MID, no matter how carefully you have constructed your MPP. He must be FWD.

    FWD line looks okay :)
     
  6. swerva3

    swerva3 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    guys any thoughts on Lake v Bower (and 130k) in the bank?
    thanks
     
  7. TerryinBangkok

    TerryinBangkok Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    5,710
    Likes Received:
    2,108
    Bower is a Lake/Dempsey/Clarke in a different coloured jumper.
    Try to aim for no more than 30-40 in the bank.
     
  8. DCAK

    DCAK New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Julz, I'm gonna come right out and say it, I don't like your team, here's why:

    Back
    Lake (injury risk), Dempsey (injury risk), Clarke (better rookie options)
    Smedts (not in Cats best 22)

    Mid
    Dangerfield (He's a FWD), Hayes (injury risk), Docherty (he's not even gonna play, injured)

    Ruck
    Miles (he's a midfielder)

    Fwd
    Chapman (He will be cotton-wooled through the year), N.Riewoldt (No!), Kerridge (Not in Crows best 22)

    So, as I see it you've made 11 selection misjudgements out of 30. 5/10.
     

Share This Page